Emigrants of Hyalopterus pruni (flying outdoors) are attracted to colour plates in the range of orange --yellow --green with an optimum at yellow, but only when these colours are unsaturated tints --i.e. when they are mixed up with white lead. (Maximum alighting occurred at a reflection of about 35%, in the range of 320---460 nm). Leaf areas of Phragmites communis Tr. (9.5 x 9.5 era) attracted twice as many landings as beet leaves (Beta vulgaris L.) From this it is concluded that a limited degree of alighting on a specific hostplant is caused by specific adaptation to the unsaturated colour of the hostplant, Phragmites. In contrast to H. pruni, Aphis ]abae prefers the more saturated colours and Beta-leaf to those of Phragmites.
Response of apple maggot flies (Rhagoletis pomonella) to two‐dimensional, sticky‐coated inanimate models of trees erected in clearings in orchards showed that color, size, form, and orientation of model all played a role in eliciting fly arrival. Among 122 × 244 cm vertical rectangular models of different colors, yellow, red, and black were the most attractive, green slightly less attractive, gray (about the same intensity of reflection as yellow) still less attractive, and white, aluminium foil, blue, and clear flexiglas least attractive. Both per model and per unit area, red vertical rectangles 122 × 244 cm were more attractive than smaller ones. Per model, the same was true for different‐size yellow vertical rectangles, but not per unit area. Yellow vertical models 3.0 m2 whose form was compact (circular, square, slightly rectangular or triangular) were more attractive than ones whose form was narrow and elongated. Vertical models were much more attractive than horizontal ones. Contour of edge (smooth or zig‐zag) was unimportant, but a model incorporating an alternating yellow and clear “checker board” pattern, shifting parallactically, elicited more R. pomonella arrivals than a solid yellow model. The normal inter‐tree flight pattern of R. pomonella was low, within 2 m of the ground. As final evidence that visual stimuli play a role in tree detection, many more R. pomonella were intercepted on clear flexiglas sheets around a real cherry tree than around empty space (tree odor was not a factor). We propose the following hypothesis to explain our findings. For an apple maggot fly in flight, a tree becomes visually discernible by its hue (fly reaction to yellow‐green) and/or the darkness of its silhouette (fly reaction to red‐black), but the latter only if the tree is large enough. The nearer a normally low‐flying fly approaches a tree, the taller becomes the silhouette and hence the more distinguishable the tree from the background. We have no evidence that any of the important visual cues are specific to host trees of R. pomonella. Zusammenfassung OPTISCHE REIZE, DIE FLIEGEN VON RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA ZU BÄUMEN ANLOCKEN Die Untersuchung befaßt sich mit der Bedeutung von optischen Reizen für das Auffinden von (Wirts‐) Bäumen durch die Apfelfliege, Rhagoletis pomonella. Die Grundmethode besteht im Vergleich des Zuflugs freilebender Fliegen zu verschieden großen, zweidimensionalen, vertikal orientierten künstlichen Baummodellen. Diese wurden auf gerodeten Flächen innerhalb oder am Rand von Kirschen‐ und Apfelplantagen aufgestellt, 8–53 m von den nächsten Bäumen entfernt. Sie wurden mit “Bird Tanglefoot” fängig gemacht. Von großen, rechteckigen Modellen (122 × 244 cm) in verschiedenen Farben erwiesen sich einerseits gelbe und grüne, andrerseits dunkelrote und schwarze als anlockend. Viel schwächer oder nicht attraktiv waren Grau (19–50% von Gelb), Weiß (20–33%), farbloses Plexiglas (21–26%), Aluminiumfolie (20%) und Blau (16%), die beiden letzten vielleicht sogar repellent. Kleine rote Rechtecke (15 × 30 cm) lösten ...
We confirm the existence of oviposition‐deterring, fruit‐marking pheromones in Rhagoletis pomonella and R. fausta and demonstrate their existence in five additional species: R. cingulata, R. indifferens, R. mendax, R. cornivora and R. tabellaria. Individuals from (1) different species belonging to different species groups did not recognize each other's marking pheromones, (2) different species within the same species group varied in reaction from complete to no cross‐recognition, (3) different wild populations of the same species always recognized each other's marking pheromones, and (4) a laboratory population of R. pomonella cultured on apples for ca. fifteen generations deposited a marking pheromone less deterrent to oviposition than that from a wild population. Finally, the water‐soluble marking pheromones of R. indifferens and R. cornivora proved effective deterrents to oviposition when collected and reapplied in aqueous solution to uninfested fruit in laboratory cages. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG MARKIERUNGSPHEROMONE BEI RHAGOLETIS—ARTEN, DIE VOR WIEDERHOLTER EIABLAGE ABSCHRECKEN Bei fünf Rhagoletisanen wird der Nachweis von Eiablage‐abschreckenden, Frucht‐markierenden Pheromonen zum ersten Mal geführt: R. cingulata, R. indifferens, R. mendax. R. cornivora und R. tabellaria. Damit erhöht sich die Zahl von Rhagoletisarten auf neun und die Zahl von pflanzenparasitischen Insektenarten auf zehn, bei denen derartige Pheromone bekannt sind. Wenn Glieder dieser fünf Arten und zusätzlich von R. pomonella und R. fausta untersucht wurden auf den Grad des Interpopulations‐ und innerartlichen Erkennens der Markierungspheromone, so ergab sich: 1. Verschiedene Populationen der selben Art erkennen untereinander die Pheromone, unabhängig von Wirt und Herkunft; 2. Verschiedene Arten innerhalb der gleichen Artengruppe variieren in ihrer Reaktion zwischen vollständigem, teilweisem und fehlendem kr***euzweisen Pheromon‐Erkennen; und 3. Verschiedene Arten von verschiedenen Artengruppen erkennen nicht gegenseitig ihre Pheromone, auch wenn sie von Wirten gleicher Gattung oder Art kommen. — Die bisher nicht identifizierten, wasserl***öslichen Markierungspheromone von R. indifferens und R. cornivora erwiesen sich als stark Eiablage‐abschreckend, wenn sie von markierten Früchten gewonnen und in wässriger Lösung bei unbefallenen Früchten in Laborkäfigen wieder angewendet wurden.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.