Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the current treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The indications of bilevel pressure support ventilation (BIPAP PSV) in OSAS patients remain controversial. The purpose of this investigation was to verify the frequency of prescription of BIPAP PSV in a group of OSAS patients when CPAP was ineffective or not tolerated during titration. The study included 286 consecutive patients > or = 18 years of age referred to two Sleep laboratories for sleep related breathing disorders (SRBD) between December 1994 and November 1995. Of these, 130 patients were enrolled and 105 (88 males, 77 females) with moderate to severe OSAS completed the study and were finally analysed. After a full night diagnostic polysomnography (PSGD), patients had a second full night PSG under nCPAP (PSGT). If nCPAP was not tolerated, or failed to correct breathing abnormalities during sleep, a second PSGT was performed, using a BIPAP PSV. Our study shows that nCPAP (mean 8.5 +/- 2.0 cmH20) was considered a satisfactory therapy in 81 patients (77%). Twenty four (23%) required BIPAP PSV (mean IPAP 13.9 +/- 2.9 cmH20). We found the highest prevalence of BIPAP in patients with OSAS associated to obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) (11 of 17) and in OSAS associated to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (nine of 16). Patients treated with BIPAP PSV were more obese and had a higher PaCO2 and sleep-related desaturations and a lower FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC and PaO2. In conclusion our study shows that CPAP therapy in the effective therapeutic option in the majority of patients with OSAS. There is a subset of patients with OSAS associated to COPD or to OHS in whom BIPAP PSV may be a better treatment modality.

In the majority of patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit with acute respiratory failure (ARF), the aetiology for ARF is quite evident. In a minority of patients no obvious aetiology is apparent at presentation. In this group a previously unrecognized sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD) may be the cause of the ARF. In spite of clinical suspicion SRBD remains infrequently diagnosed in ARF also because the technology necessary for this type of diagnosis (polysomnography) is usually unavailable in Intensive Care Units. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of portable polysomnography system (PSGp) in a group of patients with ARF of unclear aetiology and with a clinical suspicion of SRBD. We studied a selected group of 14 patients (eight males, six females) admitted to an Intermediate Intensive care unit with varying degree of acute respiratory failure. Mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years, pH 7.28 (0.04), PaO2 5.6 (0.7) kPa), PaO2 (8.8 (1.6) kPa), Body mass index 42.7 (9.6) kg m(-2). The patients had no history of skeletal, neuromuscular or cardiovascular disease. None of them had a history of overt chronic lung diseases or had obvious respiratory tract infections. They were submitted to cardiac and respiratory functional evaluation and to nightly PSGp (VITALOG HMS 5000, Respironics Inc., Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.) which was performed in an intermediate intensive care unit. Ten subjects had obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAS), with mean respiratory disorder index h(-1) (RDI) 60.1 (25.9) [in five associated with obesity-hypoventilation syndrome (OHS)]; two had central sleep apnoea with mean RDI 45 (28.3) (one with hypothyroidism and one with cerebral multiple infarctions and right hemidiaphragmatic paralysis) and two had OHS with mean RDI 12.5 (3.5). Nocturnal hypoventilation was present in almost all patients. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was effective in three patients. Eight patients needed to be treated with BILEVEL (BiPAP, Respironics Inc.) airway positive pressure in timed or spontaneous/timed modes. Two patients required intubation and mechanical ventilatory treatment. In one patient with hypothyroidism was sufficient to institute hormonal therapy. Our study shows that acute respiratory failure due to SRBD is not exceptional in an Intermediate Intensive Care Unit and that if clinical suspicion is strong, portable polysomnography may yield diagnostic confirmation and help in establishing appropriate treatment and in avoiding the invasive ventilatory treatment.

The authors report 2 typical asthmatic cases in whom the administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) resulted in bronchodilatation. 500 mg of ASA were administered intravenously to 1 patient and the other was treated with ASA, indomethacin, noramidopyrine intravenously and acetaminophen orally during a bronchospastic attack. FEV₁ and SRAW were measured before and after drug administration. The test was repeated with placebo (physiological saline). FEV₁ increased rapidly after ASA and NSAID administration. Although the pathogenesis of asthma reversed by aspirin is not entirely clear, the authors suggest an alteration of sensitivity of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme due to the inhibitory action of ASA and NSAID

The role of the expiratory phase in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is not well known. The aim of our study was to verify the contribution of expiratory narrowing to apnoea in a group of OSA patients by evaluating the effects of short-term treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and bi-level positive airway pressure (BIPAP). We studied a selected group of 10 OSA patients whose therapeutic pressure level of CPAP was at least 10 cm H2O. During CPAP therapy the mean apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) and oxyhaemoglobin desaturation index (ODI) decreased from 64.8 to 6.3 (P < 0.001) and from 58.5 to 6.1 (P < 0.001), respectively and mean nadir SAO2 increased from 62.0 to 91.6 (P < 0.001). None of the patients reached optimal setting (elimination of snoring, reduction of apnoeas and non-apnoeic desaturation events at least to 15 or less per hour of sleep and maintenance of oxygen saturation approximately 90%) during IPPV and two patients did not tolerate final IPAP pressure levels. When a critical level of EPAP (BIPAP) was applied in the same night to these patients, optimal setting was reached in all subjects. During BIPAP, mean AHI decreased from 64.8 to 7.4 (P < 0.001); ODI decreased from 58.5 to 7.6 (P < 0.001) and nadir SAO2 increased from 62.0 to 91.2 (P < 0.001). Our study confirms the essential role of a critical level of EPAP in successful ventilatory treatment in OSA, thereby indicating, in agreement with few previous studies, the critical role of end of expiratory occlusion in OSA pathogenesis.

The protective effect on bronchospasm, induced by carbachol, of 2 puffs of fenoterol (200 µg), ipratropium bromide (80 µg) and Duovent (200 µg fenoterol + 80 µg ipratropium bromide) was compared in a group of 12 asthmatic patients. The double-blind study was always performed at the same time of day, 2 and 5 h after premedication, on 4 consecutive days. After the 1st day, when placebo was given, the drugs were administered randomly. As regards PD₂₀ FEV₁ (dose of carbachol necessary to determine a 20% decrease in FEV₁), Duovent was found to be the most active drug. A very clear difference was seen 2h later, not only compared to fenoterol (PD₂₀ placebo, x ± SD: 90.8 ± 93.2 µg; PD₂₀ Duovent: 1,876.5 ± 1,103.5 µg; PD₂₀ fenoterol: 324.3 ± 220.7 µg) but also with ipratropium bromide (PD₂₀: 1,215.8 ± 950 µg). After 5 h, the three treatments maintained a significant action, but the efficacy of Duovent, while significantly greater than that of fenoterol, was very similar to that of ipratropium (PD₂₀ placebo: 78.4 ± 92.6 µg; PD₂₀ fenoterol: 134.6 ± 138.2 µg; PD₂₀ ipratropium bromide: 295.4 ± 337 µg; PD₂₀ Duovent: 286.7 ± 181.2 µg)