Adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins (gals) exert their functionality by the cis/trans-cross-linking of distinct glycans after initial one-point binding. In order to define the specificity of ensuing association events leading to cross-linking, we recently established a cell-based assay using fluorescent glycoconjugates as flow cytometry probes and tested it on two human gals (gal-1 and -3). Here we present a systematic study of tandem-repeat-type gal-4, -8 and -9 loaded on Raji cells resulting in the following key insights: (i) all three gals bound to oligolactosamines; (ii) binding to ligands with Galβ1-3GlcNAc or Galβ1-3GalNAc as basic motifs was commonly better than that to canonical Galβ1-4GlcNAc; (iii) all three gals bound to 3'-O-sulfated and 3'-sialylated disaccharides mentioned above better than that to parental neutral forms and (iv) histo-blood group ABH antigens were the highest affinity ligands in both the cell and the solid-phase assay. Fine specificity differences were revealed as follows: (i) gal-8 and -9, but not gal-4, bound to disaccharide Galβ1-3GlcNAc; (ii) increase in binding due to negatively charged substituents was marked only in the case of gal-4 and (iii) gal-4 and -8 bound preferably to histo-blood group A glycans, whereas gal-9 targeted B-type glycans. Experiments with single carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) of gal-4 showed that the C-CRD preferably bound to ABH glycans, whereas the N-CRD associated with oligolactosamines. In summary, the comparative analysis disclosed the characteristic profiles of glycan reactivity for the accessible CRD of cell-bound gals. These results indicate the distinct sets of functionality for these three members of the same subgroup of human gals.

We examined the assembly of DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) into higher-order structures using atomic force microscopy, optical and electrophoretic methods, NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling. Our results suggest that parallel blunt-ended G4s with single-nucleotide or modified loops may form different types of multimers, ranging from stacks of intramolecular structures and/or interlocked dimers and trimers to wires. Decreasing the annealing rate and increasing salt or oligonucleotide concentrations shifted the equilibrium from intramolecular G4s to higher-order structures. Control antiparallel and hybrid G4s demonstrated no polymorphism or aggregation in our experiments. The modification that mimics abasic sites (1′,2′-dideoxyribose residues) in loops enhanced the oligomerization/multimerization of both the 2-tetrad and 3-tetrad G4 motifs. Our results shed light on the rules that govern G4 rearrangements. Gaining control over G4 folding enables the harnessing of the full potential of such structures for guided assembly of supramolecular DNA structures for nanotechnology.

The involvement of galectins as pleiotropic regulators of cell adhesion and growth in disease progression explains the interest to define their ligand-binding properties. Toward this end, it is desirable to approach in vivo conditions to attain medical relevance. In order to simulate physiological conditions with cell surface glycans as recognition sites and galectins as mediators of intercellular contacts we developed an assay using galectin-loaded Raji cells. The extent of surface binding of fluorescent neoglycoconjugates depended on the lectin presence and the type of lectin, the nature of the probes' carbohydrate headgroup and the density of unsubstituted beta-galactosides on the cell surface. Using the most frequently studied galectins-1 and -3, application of this assay led to rather equal binding levels for linear and branched oligomers of N-acetyllactosamine. A clear preference of galectin-3 for alpha1-3-linked galactosylated lactosamine was noted. In parallel, a panel of 24 neoglycoconjugates was tested as inhibitors of galectin binding from solution to N-glycans of surface-immobilized asialofetuin. These two assays differ in presentation of the galectin and ligand, facilitating identification of assay-dependent properties. Under the condition of the cell assay, selectivity among oligosaccharides for the lectins was higher, and extraordinary affinity of galectin-1 to 3'-O-sulfated probes in a solid-phase assay was lost in the cell assay. Having introduced and validated a cell assay, the comprehensive profiling of ligand binding to cell-surface-presented galectins is made possible.

No abstract

G-quadruplex (G4) sites in the human genome frequently colocalize with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)-bound sites in CpG islands (CGIs). We aimed to clarify the role of G4s in CTCF positioning. Molecular modeling data suggested direct interactions, so we performed in vitro binding assays with quadruplex-forming sequences from CGIs in the human genome. G4s bound CTCF with Kd values similar to that of the control duplex, while respective i-motifs exhibited no affinity for CTCF. Using ChIP-qPCR assays, we showed that G4-stabilizing ligands enhance CTCF occupancy at a G4-prone site in STAT3 gene. In view of the reportedly increased CTCF affinity for hypomethylated DNA, we next questioned whether G4s also facilitate CTCF recruitment to CGIs via protecting CpG sites from methylation. Bioinformatics analysis of previously published data argued against such a possibility. Finally, we questioned whether G4s facilitate CTCF recruitment by affecting chromatin structure. We showed that three architectural chromatin proteins of the high mobility group colocalize with G4s in the genome and recognize parallel-stranded or mixed-topology G4s in vitro. One of such proteins, HMGN3, contributes to the association between G4s and CTCF according to our bioinformatics analysis. These findings support both direct and indirect roles of G4s in CTCF recruitment.