Inhaled corticosteroids decrease airway responsiveness in asthma partly through suppression of airway inflammation. We have previously demonstrated that inhaled budesonide reduced airway responsiveness to the mast cell stimulus adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) to a threefold greater extent than to methacholine and sodium metabisulfite, suggesting that AMP responsiveness may be a more sensitive marker of airway inflammation and steroid action in order to assess a dose-response relationship. To investigate this, we studied the effects of three doses of the novel corticosteroid ciclesonide (50 micrograms, 200 micrograms, and 800 micrograms) inhaled as a dry powder twice daily on airway responsiveness to AMP and inflammatory parameters in induced sputum. In a three-parallel-dose group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, with a washout period of 3 to 8 wk, a total of 29 patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma underwent AMP challenge and sputum induction before and after 14 d of treatment with ciclesonide or matched placebo. Compared with placebo, ciclesonide 100 micrograms, 400 micrograms, and 1,600 micrograms daily reduced airway responsiveness to AMP by 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 3.4, not significant [NS]), 2.0 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.6, p < 0.05), and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 4. 4, p < 0.05) doubling doses, respectively, and this reduction in airway responsiveness was dose-dependent (p = 0.039). A significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum was observed after 400 micrograms and 1,600 micrograms daily ciclesonide (p < 0. 05), but this was not dose-dependent. Sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was significantly reduced after 400 micrograms daily ciclesonide only (p < 0.05). Thus, in patients with mild to moderate asthma, assessment of airway responsiveness to AMP, rather than inflammatory parameters in induced sputum, represents a sensitive method to evaluate a dose-response relationship of an inhaled corticosteroid and may have applications in evaluating other novel inhaled corticosteroids.

Gastric proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are substituted benzimidazole prodrugs that require an acid-induced activation. Its rate depends on the reactivity of the molecule relative to the environmental pH and determines the drug’s tissue selectivity. Factors affecting the exposure of moderately acidic tissues to the activated PPI are the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC), serum protein binding, the partition coefficient logP and the serum elimination half-life relative to the chemical activation half-life at a critical tissue pH of about 5. These parameters have therefore been determined in a comparative fashion in the present study. The data shows that pantoprazole is less likely to undergo unwanted activation at moderately acidic targets as opposed to the parietal cell, compared to omeprazole. Actually, although 40 mg pantoprazole (steady state) gave a slightly higher serum AUC of the total parent compound than 40 mg omeprazole (10.5 vs. 7.1 µmol × h × l^–1), a higher serum protein binding of pantoprazole versus omeprazole (98 vs. 96%) reversed the AUC values for the free drug in favor of a lower value for pantoprazole (0.19 vs. 0.28 µmol × h × 1^–1). It is the free parent compound that equilibrates across cell membranes to be activated in acidic tissue compartments. At pH 5.1, the activation half-life of pantoprazole was 4.7 versus 1.4 h for omeprazole, the latter being in the order of the common serum elimination half-life determined in an intraindividual comparison (1.24 vs. 1.25 h). Thus, pantoprazole is eliminated faster from blood than it is activated at a pH of about 5, while omeprazole is as quickly activated at this pH as it is eliminated from blood. Biological in vitro experiments confirmed that pantoprazole displays a lower liability to interfere with unwanted biological targets. This has been demonstrated in vitro for inhibition of both renal Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase, lysosomal acidification and the production of reactive oxygen species by neutrophils.

The anti-asthmatic effects of theophylline may supplement those of inhaled steroids in asthma. The aim of the present trial was to study how the addition of theophylline compares to doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in asthmatics who remain symptomatic on beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 400 microg x day(-1). The trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in several European countries. Sixty nine patients were treated for 6 weeks with theophylline plus BDP 400 microg x day(-1), compared to 64 patients treated with BDP 800 micro x day(-1). The mean+/-SD serum theophylline concentration was 10.1+/-4.2 mg x L(-1). Lung function measurements were made throughout the study and patients kept daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptoms and salbutamol usage. Forced expiratory volume in one second and PEF at week 6 were significantly increased by both treatments (p<0.01). PEF variability was reduced by about 30% in both groups. There were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. The study demonstrated clinical equivalence of theophylline plus beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microg x day(-1) and beclomethasone dipropionate 800 microg x day(-1) in patients whose asthma is not controlled on beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microg x day(-1). The results support the use of theophylline as a steroid-sparing agent. The combination of low-dose inhaled steroid plus theophylline is a suitable treatment for moderate asthma.

For a two-way cross-over design, which appears to be the most common experimental design in bioavailability studies, 95%-confidence limits for expected bioavailability can be obtained by classical analysis of variance (ANOVA). If symmetry of the confidence interval is desired about zero (differences) or unity (ratios) rather than about the corresponding point estimator, Westlake's modification can be used. Two nonparametric methods and their adaptations to bioavailability ratios are reviewed, one based on Wilcoxon's signed rank test (Tukey), and the other on Pitman's permutation test. The necessary assumptions and the merits of these procedures are discussed. The methods are illustrated by an example of a comparative bioavailability study. A FORTRAN program facilitating the procedures is available from the authors upon request.