IntroductionVisible hematuria is not rare in patients on anticoagulant therapy. There is no consensus regarding the diagnostic approach for them; some authors suggest restricted volume of diagnostic procedures because of the low number of urological etiology found. Some antibiotics have been reported to potentiate the effect of oral anticoagulants.Material and methodsThe study addresses the need for urological assessment of patients on anticoagulation therapy and the possible role of some drugs administrated simultaneously with an oral anticoagulant, for the onset of macroscopic hematuria. Patients hospitalized with hematuria, both with or without anticoagulation therapy, were investigated and followed up.ResultsThe onset of hematuria depends on the monitoring of oral anticoagulation. INR (International Normalized Ratio) value corresponds with the probability of non-urological etiology, where INR>4 carries relatively low risk for urological and malignant etiology. Some antibiotics may influence the anticoagulation effect, so INR value may be elevated and hematuria may occur.ConclusionsAnticoagulation therapy should be administrated carefully and individually. The risk of urological etiology of hematuria is lower in patients on oral anticoagulants (especially when INR >4), however, it is not zero.

Multiple primary cancers are usually defined as primary malignant tumors of different histological origins in one person. Recently, there has been an increase in the number of patients diagnosed with multiple primary cancers. The study aims to evaluate the role of PET/CT in detecting second primary and subsequent tumors as well as to demonstrate the influence on the treatment management in patients with histologically proven synchronous or metachronous tumors. Fifty patients with clinically proven at least one malignancy have been evaluated and followed up for a year. Another inclusion criterion was a biopsy-proven additional primary synchronous (within 2-6 months after the first one) or metachronous (more than 6 months after the diagnosis of the first one) malignant tumor in a different organ. All patients were scanned on GE Discovery PET/CT 16 slices scanner from the top of the head to mid-thigh. The study was performed one hour after injection, using the weight-adjusted activity, hydration of patients with diuretic stimulation, and oral/i.v. contrast intake. Thirty out of 50 patients were females. The youngest patient was 25 years old, while the highest age was 84 years. Ten of the patients had third primary tumors and one patient had four different malignancies. Metachronous tumors were 2.4-fold higher than synchronous ones. The minimum time to detect a second tumor was 1 month, while the maximum was 15 years. As second malignancies we detected fourteen gastrointestinal cancers (28%), ten urogenital ones (20%), ten pulmonary tumors (20%), five breast cancers (10%), four lymphoma patients (8%), four head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (8%), two NET (4%), and one sarcoma (2%). As a result of the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan, the therapy plans of all 50 patients required modification at the minimum for the second tumor. 64% of the patients had multimodality therapy for their first cancer, which suggests that this approach could play an important role in the development of MPM. 81% of the additional malignancies in the female group, detected by PET/CT were in stages I or II, which provides a higher probability of cure. On the other hand, we detected advanced stage second primary disease in 70% of the patients in the male group. PET/CT can identify a significant number of additional primary neoplasms in patients with known primary cancer, acquiring combined metabolic and morphologic information, as well as its whole-body protocol. Integrated PET/CT can significantly modify the assessment of the tumor's dissemination and often change patient management substantially. Subsequent primary lesions identified after PET/CT scan are mainly in the early stage and thus have an excellent likelihood of being cured if treated promptly and aggressively.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and the utility of F-18fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in the clinical management of patients presenting with lymph node metastasis of undefined primary origin (CUP). A total of 53 patients (34 males, 19 females) with a diagnosis of lymph node metastasis according to the histopathology and/or conventional imaging were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into four groups according to the initial location of their metastasisgroup 1, cervical lymph nodes (n = 39), group 2, axillary lymph nodes (n = 6), group 3, mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 2) and group 4, abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes (n = 6). The site of a probable primary malignancy suggested by PET/CT was confirmed by biopsy/further investigations or follow-up. 18F-FDG PET/CT accurately detected the primary carcinoma in 19 of 53 patients (36%), with head and neck cancer and lung carcinoma being the most common primary locations. The PET-CT scan results were negative for primary site localization in 13% of patients (false-negative), while 45% had true negative results, and 6% displayed false-positive results. Additional distant metastatic foci were identified in 21 of all patients (40%). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of the study were identified as 73%, 89%, and 81%, respectively; in the group with cervical lymph node metastasis sensitivity 70% and specificity 84%. To conclude, 18F-FDG PET/CT is a sensitive and selective procedure for detecting unknown primary tumors, especially in the clinical setting of cervical lymph node metastasis and its use should be encouraged earlier in pre-treatment phase of CUP-patients, leading to higher detection of probable primary sites, guiding subsequent biopsy, and more accurate detection of distant metastases in a single examination.

A case of occult carcinoma of the ureteral stump is reported. A 67-year-old man presented with pain syndrome due to multiple bone metastases from unknown primary origin detected by previous imaging studies as magnetic resonance imaging, whole body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and technetium-99m methyldiphosphonate bone scan. He had undergone a right nephrectomy for a benign disease previously. He was referred to our department for an 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to help localize possible primary tumor. Our observations in this case show that the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT successfully and more accurately evaluated the overall tumor burden and led to a rapid decision of an adequate therapeutic approach.