Although S. aureus is still the most frequently detected bacterium in our wound care center, there has been a shift in the bacterial spectrum from gram-positive towards gram-negative bacteria over the last decade.

Summary Background The number of invasive Candida infections has significantly increased in recent decades. For the successful treatment of fungal infections, rapid identification at the species level, particularly in polyfungal infections, is a key factor. In this study, four commercially available chromogenic media, CandiSelect™ 4 (CS4), chromID™ Candida Agar (CCA), BBL™ CHROMagar™ Candida Medium (BBL) and Brilliance™ Candida Agar (BCA) were evaluated for Candida identification. Material/Methods Overall, 181 bronchial secretion samples from intensive care patients were analysed prospectively. In addition, 18 primarily sterile materials, previously tested positive for Candida, were investigated retrospectively. All samples were cultured as recommended by the manufacturer and visually inspected after 24 and 48 hours by three independent investigators. As a control, colonies were identified by MALDI‐TOF MS. Specificity and sensitivity were determined for C albicans identification prospectively. Results CS4 and BCA showed the best overall consensus with the identification results reached by MALDI‐TOF MS for Candida albicans and species. A clear differentiation between the species could be ascertained via easily identifiable, species‐specific coloration in contrast to BBL and CCA. Sensitivity for C albicans (n = 73) identification varied between 32% (BCA) and 69% (CS4 and CCA) after 24 hours and 68% (BBL) and 82% (BCA) after 48 hours incubation, while specificity ranged between 62% (BBL) and 81% (CCA) after 24 hours and 82% (BBL) and 85% (CS4) after 48 hours. Conclusion CS4 and BCA are recommended for routine identification of Candida species in human samples.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of blood culture bottles in comparison to conventional microbiological culture techniques in detecting causative microorganisms of endophthalmitis and to determine their anti-infective susceptibility profiles. All consecutive cases with clinically suspected endophthalmitis in a university-based ophthalmology department between January 2009 and December 2016 were analysed in this retrospective comparative case series. Samples from 247 patients with suspected endophthalmitis underwent microbiological diagnostic work-up. All three culture methods were performed from 140 vitreous specimens. Vitreous fluid specimens were inoculated in blood culture bottles, aerobic and anaerobic broth solutions, and on solid media. Anti-infective susceptibility profiles were evaluated by semi-automated methods and/or gradient diffusion methods. Microorganisms were grown in 82 of 140 specimens for which all methods were performed (59%). Microorganisms were more frequently grown from blood culture bottles (55%) compared to broth solution (45%, p = 0.007) and solid media (33%, p < 0.0001). Considerable differences in the performance among culture media were detected for fungal pathogens. All grown fungi were detected by blood culture bottles (11 of 11, 100%). Broth solution recovered 64% and solid media 46% of grown fungi. No Gram-positive bacterium was resistant to vancomycin and all Gram-negative pathogens except for one isolate were susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins. In suspected endophthalmitis patients, blood culture bottles have a higher overall pathogen detection rate from vitreous fluid compared to conventional microbiological media, especially for fungi. The initial intravitreal antibiotic therapy with vancomycin plus third-generation cephalosporins appears to be an appropriate treatment approach for bacterial endophthalmitis.

The Accelerate PhenoTM system (APS, Accelerate Diagnostics) is approved for the rapid identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of microorganisms grown from positive blood cultures inoculated with blood from septic patients. We evaluated the performance for identification and AST from positive blood culture bottles inoculated with primary sterile non-blood specimens from patients with suspected severe infections. One hundred positive blood culture bottles with primary sterile specimens (63 cerebrospinal fluids, 16 ascites, 7 pleural fluids, 4 vitreous fluids, 5 joint aspirates and 5 other aspirates) from 100 patients were included. Pathogen identification was in agreement with conventional methods for 72 of 100 cultures (72%) and for 81 of 112 (72%) pathogens when considering all pathogens, for 72 of 92 (78%) cultures and 81 of 104 (78%) pathogens when considering on-panel pathogens only. Eight of 31 isolates (26%) not identified by APS were pathogens not included in the APS panel. APS and conventional methods accordingly identified all pathogens from two of nine polymicrobial cultures (22%). APS generated antimicrobial resistance results for 57 pathogens of 57 cultures. The overall category agreement between APS and culture based AST was 91.2%, the rates for minor errors 6.9%, major 1.7% and very major errors 0.2%. APS may accelerate pathogen identification and phenotypic AST from positive blood culture bottles inoculated with primary sterile specimens from patients with serious infections, especially for hospitals without on-site microbiology laboratory. However, the inclusion of non-blood specimens with a high likelihood of polymicrobial infections may result in an inferior performance.

Infection with Treponema pallidum is on the rise. In this narrative literature review, we show that the incidence of rare manifestations of syphilis, such as intracerebral gummata, is increasing and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intracerebral lesions. With the exemplary case that we present here, we aim to raise awareness of the resurgence of this disease, which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intracerebral lesions, especially for patients who have a risk profile for syphilis, and serological testing for T. pallidum prior to surgery should be discussed in order to avoid an unnecessary operation.