Academic dishonesty and its consequences have become increasingly complex. Highly accessible electronic media, profound consequences for misconduct and reporting, and lack of standard practice intensify the issues. We surveyed 270 faculty members to determine whether they had been confronted with plagiarism and if they felt prepared to deal with it. Using case studies, we examined faculty characterizations of the severity of students' uncited use of another's work, and their suggested actions, reports, and sanctions, by source, use, and amount of material. In addition to multiple interactions, we found that faculty members' perceptions of severity strongly mediate the consequences they recommend. However, within-case, recommended consequences (e.g., course actions, reports and sanctions) vary widely. Implications for development of guidelines based on level of plagiarism are discussed.Plagiarism of printed material has long been considered academic misconduct, punishable in forms varying from mild reprimands to expulsion from the institution in which it occurs. However, the advent of the "information age," as well as access to website-based resources (ranging from journal abstracts to entire pa-

Despite the promise of Brown v. Board of Education, segregation is alive and well in today's schools. African American students are overrepresented in special education, have higher dropout rates, are suspended and expelled at higher rates, and are subject to persistent educational inequity. The role of psychoeducational assessment at the intersection of difference and disability has contributed to the persistent misidentification and overrepresentation of African American students in special education. However, paradigms for assessment hold promise for fulfilling the hope of Brown in tomorrow's schools. In order to describe the impact of past and present psychoeducational assessment practices on African American learners, we track the evolution of psychoeducational assessment in the context of three eras: (a) prior to Brown, or “old schools”; (b) post Brown, an era of hope for “new schools”; and (c) the situation in today's schools. The education of African American students and students with disabilities emerge as parallel and intertwined throughout this history.

No abstract