doi: medRxiv preprint NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.

Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from global high incidence regions identifies crucial genes and potential cancer markers

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the ninth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are the two main histological subtypes with distinct epidemiological and clinical features. While the global incidence of ESCC is declining, the incidence of EAC is increasing in many countries. Decades of epidemiologic research have identified distinct environmental exposures for ESCC and EAC subtypes. Recent advances in understanding the genomic aspects of EC have advanced our understanding of EC causes and led to using specific genomic alterations in EC tumors as biomarkers for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of this cancer. Nevertheless, the prognosis of EC is still poor, with a five-year survival rate of less than 20%. Currently, there are significant challenges for early detection and secondary prevention for both ESCC and EAC subtypes, but Cytosponge™ is shifting this position for EAC. Primary prevention remains the preferred strategy for reducing the global burden of EC. In this review, we will summarize recent advances, current status, and future prospects of the studies related to epidemiology, time trends, environmental risk factors, prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment for both EC subtypes.

Background The contribution of alcohol to the large burden of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in east Africa remains uncertain and difficult to assess owing to complex consumption patterns of traditional and commercial drinks. We aimed to assess whether alcohol drinking, overall and at specific intake levels, contributes to ESCC risk in east Africa. MethodsWe did a hospital-based case-control study in Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi, which included comprehensive assessment of a variety of locally consumed alcohol that we used to classify drinkers as exclusively low alcohol-byvolume (ABV; <30% ABV) drinkers or drinkers of some high-ABV drinks, as well as the number of drinks consumed, average weekly ethanol intake, and the contribution of each drink type to overall ethanol consumption. Cases were patients aged 18 years and older with incident primary ESCC, confirmed histologically for the majority of cases, and a clinical diagnosis for the remainder. Controls were frequency-matched on age and sex in a 1:1 ratio with cases. The controls were recruited from the same hospitals as cases and included outpatients, inpatients, and hospital visitors who did not have cancer or any other digestive disease. Consenting participants took part in face-to-face interviews in which they were asked whether they had ever consumed alcohol (the primary exposure variable); those who had were asked follow-up questions about their consumption habits for different alcoholic drinks. Findings 1279 cases and 1346 controls were recruited between Aug 5, 2013, and May 24, 2020, including 430 cases and 440 controls from Kenya, 310 cases and 313 controls from Tanzania, and 539 cases and 593 controls from Malawi. 65 (4•8%) of 1344 cases were excluded. Consistent positive associations with ESCC risk were found for ever having consumed alcohol in Kenyan men and Tanzanian men, and for daily number of drinks and estimated ethanol intake in Kenya, Tanzania (both sexes) and Malawian women. Corresponding population-attributable fractions of ESCC for those reporting ever drinking alcohol (vs never drinking) were 65% (95% CI 52-78) in Kenyan men and 23% (<1-45) in Kenyan women, and 56% (95% CI 36-76) in Tanzanian men and 5% (0-42) in Tanzanian women. Increased risk and population-attributable fractions were almost entirely due to risks in high-ABV drinkers.Interpretation Alcohol appears to be a substantial contributor to ESCC risk in east Africa, particularly among men, and a large fraction of ESCC could be prevented by cessation or reduction of alcohol consumption. Future studies should consider independent ascertainment of alcohol intake to assess the potential of under-reporting in Malawi.

BackgroundInter-women and intra-women comparisons of mammographic density (MD) are needed in research, clinical and screening applications; however, MD measurements are influenced by mammography modality (screen film/digital) and digital image format (raw/processed). We aimed to examine differences in MD assessed on these image types.MethodsWe obtained 1294 pairs of images saved in both raw and processed formats from Hologic and General Electric (GE) direct digital systems and a Fuji computed radiography (CR) system, and 128 screen-film and processed CR-digital pairs from consecutive screening rounds. Four readers performed Cumulus-based MD measurements (n = 3441), with each image pair read by the same reader. Multi-level models of square-root percent MD were fitted, with a random intercept for woman, to estimate processed–raw MD differences.ResultsBreast area did not differ in processed images compared with that in raw images, but the percent MD was higher, due to a larger dense area (median 28.5 and 25.4 cm2 respectively, mean √dense area difference 0.44 cm (95% CI: 0.36, 0.52)). This difference in √dense area was significant for direct digital systems (Hologic 0.50 cm (95% CI: 0.39, 0.61), GE 0.56 cm (95% CI: 0.42, 0.69)) but not for Fuji CR (0.06 cm (95% CI: −0.10, 0.23)). Additionally, within each system, reader-specific differences varied in magnitude and direction (p < 0.001). Conversion equations revealed differences converged to zero with increasing dense area. MD differences between screen-film and processed digital on the subsequent screening round were consistent with expected time-related MD declines.ConclusionsMD was slightly higher when measured on processed than on raw direct digital mammograms. Comparisons of MD on these image formats should ideally control for this non-constant and reader-specific difference.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0787-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.