BACKGROUNDIn healthy paediatric patients undergoing mask induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, the induction time can be significantly shortened without an increase in the frequency of airway or vital sign complications using a high concentration, primed circuit technique compared with a conventional, incremental induction method. The vital capacity-rapid inhalation group primed with sevoflurane 8% was the fastest with no relevant side effects. (1) Sevoflurane using this technique was very well tolerated, indicated by high haemodynamic stability and a reduced rate of postoperative restlessness, shivering, nausea and vomiting. (2) It has a definite role in predicted difficult airway patients.
BACKGROUNDEpidural anaesthesia can be used as a sole anaesthetic for procedures involving the lower limbs, pelvis, perineum and lower abdomen. Different local anaesthetics are used for epidural anaesthesia, most popular being Lignocaine, Bupivacaine and now Ropivacaine. Ropivacaine is a new amino amide long-acting local anaesthetic and has got all the advantages of ideal local anaesthetic for epidural anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2 agonist, is the most recent agent. It has sedative, analgesic and haemodynamic stabilising effects in addition to reduction of anaesthetic drug requirement when used as an adjuvant in regional anaesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODSWith Institutional Ethical Committee clearance, this prospective non-blinded randomised clinical study was conducted at Seven Hills Hospital, Visakhapatnam, to compare clinical effects of epidural Ropivacaine 0.75% alone with Ropivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg for lower abdominal surgeries among 60 patients of ASA Grade I and II as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were selected in random fashion [computer-based randomisation] to avoid any kind of bias and to allow comparability of results. Group-A patients received 20 mL of 0.75% Ropivacaine plus 1 mL of sodium chloride 0.9% epidurally and Group-B patients received 20 mL of 0.75% Ropivacaine plus 1 mL of Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg diluted with Sodium chloride 0.9%, so that the volume will be completed to 1 mL epidurally in strict aseptic conditions in sitting position at L2-L3 interspace and monitored for sensory and motor blockade parameters and complications occurred among both groups were observed. RESULTSResults showed that the average time of onset of sensory blockade Group-B (4.2 ± 1.21 min) was significantly earlier when compared to Group-A (9.333 ± 2.84 min). Time taken to achieve Highest Sensory Level in Group-B (12.97 ± 2.87 min) was less when compared to Group-A (18.73 ± 2.03 min), duration of sensory blockade in Group-A was shorter with mean value of 284.1667 ± 25.86 minutes compared to mean value of 368.83 ± 25.16 minutes in Group-B. The average onset of motor block for Group-B (17.07 ± 4.60 min) was earlier than Group-A (25.07 ± 3.95 min). The mean total duration of motor blockade of Group-B (302.16 ± 31.03 min) was longer than Group-A (223.5 ± 24.71 min). Coming to complications, Group-A had higher complications when compared to Group-B, but the difference was not statistically significant. But in case of complication-Bradycardia, the proportion of patients having bradycardia was significanlty more in Group-B when compared with Group-A. CONCLUSIONWith this study, we concluded that Dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg.kg -1 added to Ropivacaine 0.75% for epidural anaesthesia provides early onset of sensory and motor blockade and prolongs the duration of analgesia and motor blockade when compared to Ropivacaine 0.75% alone in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. KEYWORDSEpidural Anaesthesia, Ropivacaine, Dexmedetomidine. HOW TO CITE THIS AR...
BACKGROUNDDifferent adjuvants are added to local anaesthetic solutions to hasten the onset of sensory and motor block in epidural anaesthesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.