What factors favor protein folding? This is a textbook question. Parsing the experimental free energies of folding/unfolding into diverse enthalpic and entropic components of solute and solvent favoring or disfavoring folding is not an easy task. In this study, we present a computational protocol for estimating the free energy contributors to protein folding semi-quantitatively using ensembles of unfolded and native states generated via molecular dynamics simulations. We tested the methodology on 35 proteins with diverse structural motifs and sizes and found that the calculated free energies correlate well with experiment (correlation coefficient ∼ 0.85), enabling us to develop a consensus view of the energetics of folding. As a more sensitive test of the methodology, we also investigated the free energies of folding of an additional 33 single point mutants and obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.8. A notable observation is that the folding free energy components appear to carry signatures of the fold (SCOP classification) of the protein. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Recent studies suggest that cosolute mixtures may exert significant non-additive effects upon protein stability. The corresponding liquid–vapor interfaces may provide useful insight into these non-additive effects. Accordingly, in this work, we relate the interfacial properties of dilute multicomponent solutions to the interactions between solutes. We first derive a simple model for the surface excess of solutes in terms of thermodynamic observables. We then develop a lattice-based statistical mechanical perturbation theory to derive these observables from microscopic interactions. Rather than adopting a random mixing approximation, this dilute solution theory (DST) exactly treats solute–solute interactions to lowest order in perturbation theory. Although it cannot treat concentrated solutions, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations demonstrate that DST describes the interactions in dilute solutions with much greater accuracy than regular solution theory. Importantly, DST emphasizes a fundamental distinction between the “intrinsic” and “effective” preferences of solutes for interfaces. DST predicts that three classes of solutes can be distinguished by their intrinsic preference for interfaces. While the surface preference of strong depletants is relatively insensitive to interactions, the surface preference of strong surfactants can be modulated by interactions at the interface. Moreover, DST predicts that the surface preference of weak depletants and weak surfactants can be qualitatively inverted by interactions in the bulk. We also demonstrate that DST can be extended to treat surface polarization effects and to model experimental data. MC simulations validate the accuracy of DST predictions for lattice systems that correspond to molar concentrations.
We employ a statistical mechanical dilute solution theory (DST) and lattice Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the interfacial properties of ternary solutions with a dominant solvent and two dilute cosolutes. We consider cosolutes with weak interfacial preferences in order to focus on the impact of cross-interactions between the two cosolute species. When the cross-interaction is properly balanced, the two cosolutes make independent, additive contributions to both bulk and interfacial properties. Conversely, repulsive cross-interactions slightly enhance the interfacial preference of both solutes. In contrast, attractive cross-interactions reduce interfacial preferences and can convert weak surfactants into weak depletants. We observe a particularly interesting transition in the symmetric case of two equivalent self-repelling cosolutes with attractive cross-interactions. In this regime, the major cosolute acts as a weak surfactant in order to avoid repulsive self-interactions, while the minor cosolute acts as a weak depletant in order to form attractive cross-interactions. The two equivalent cosolutes switch roles depending upon their relative concentration. DST very accurately describes the surface tension and surface excess of simulated lattice solutions up to molar concentrations. More importantly, DST provides quantitative and qualitative insight into the mechanism by which cosolute interactions modulate interfacial preferences.
One of the main barriers to accurate computational protein structure prediction is searching the vast space of protein conformations. Distance restraints or inter-residue contacts have been used to reduce this search space, easing the discovery of the correct folded state. It has been suggested that about 1 contact for every 12 residues may be sufficient to predict structure at fold level accuracy. Here, we use coarse-grained structure-based models in conjunction with molecular dynamics simulations to examine this empirical prediction. We generate sparse contact maps for 15 proteins of varying sequence lengths and topologies and find that given perfect secondary-structural information, a small fraction of the native contact map (5%-10%) suffices to fold proteins to their correct native states. We also find that different sparse maps are not equivalent and we make several observations about the type of maps that are successful at such structure prediction. Long range contacts are found to encode more information than shorter range ones, especially for α and αβ-proteins. However, this distinction reduces for β-proteins. Choosing contacts that are a consensus from successful maps gives predictive sparse maps as does choosing contacts that are well spread out over the protein structure. Additionally, the folding of proteins can also be used to choose predictive sparse maps. Overall, we conclude that structure-based models can be used to understand the efficacy of structure-prediction restraints and could, in future, be tuned to include specific force-field interactions, secondary structure errors and noise in the sparse maps.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.