2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A component analysis of the free energies of folding of 35 proteins: A consensus view on the thermodynamics of folding at the molecular level

Abstract: What factors favor protein folding? This is a textbook question. Parsing the experimental free energies of folding/unfolding into diverse enthalpic and entropic components of solute and solvent favoring or disfavoring folding is not an easy task. In this study, we present a computational protocol for estimating the free energy contributors to protein folding semi-quantitatively using ensembles of unfolded and native states generated via molecular dynamics simulations. We tested the methodology on 35 proteins w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salt concentrations did not have important impact on the resulting binding free energies, therefore 0.15 M was used as in the MD simulation. It is well known that MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA usually overestimate the absolute binding free energy, therefore the resulting binding free energies were scaled down using the scaling factor of 2.45 as proposed for the MM/GBSA method by DasGupta et al [ 42 ]. So obtained binding free energy results were used to estimate the qualitative differences between the two COVID viruses, not the absolute values of the binding free energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salt concentrations did not have important impact on the resulting binding free energies, therefore 0.15 M was used as in the MD simulation. It is well known that MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA usually overestimate the absolute binding free energy, therefore the resulting binding free energies were scaled down using the scaling factor of 2.45 as proposed for the MM/GBSA method by DasGupta et al [ 42 ]. So obtained binding free energy results were used to estimate the qualitative differences between the two COVID viruses, not the absolute values of the binding free energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Molecular mechanics with generalized Born and surface area solvation (MM/GBSA) method was employed using the mmpbsa.py script (Eqs 2 & 3) [40,41]. The resulting binding free energies were scaled down using the scaling factor of 2.45 as proposed for the MM/GBSA method by DasGupta et al [42].…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics (Md) Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas-phase infrared (IR) spectroscopy of small and medium peptides allows insight into protein folding forces at the atomic level. Thanks to the development of various techniques to transfer intact biomolecules into the gas phase, IR spectroscopy became a routine tool for studies of biomolecular systems of increasing size and complexity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean square fluctuation of the minimum distances between proteins and ligands was observed in MD (RMSF, Å) [47]. The plots were generated using the Qtrace program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%