Through this systematic approach we present an unbiased overview of all published preclinical studies investigating the effect of bladder tissue engineering on cystometric bladder capacity. Preclinical research in healthy animals appears to show the feasibility of bladder augmentation by tissue engineering. However, in view of the disappointing clinical results based on healthy animal models new approaches should also be evaluated in preclinical models using dysfunctional/diseased bladders. This endeavor may aid in the development of clinically applicable tissue engineered bladder augmentation with satisfactory long-term outcome.

Introduction: Rapture of a renal angiomyolipoma and massive retroperitoneal hemorrhage, during pregnancy is rare and occasionally fatal. The association of this complication with pregnancy has been reported sporadically in the literature.

In the field of regenerative medicine, various types of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable scaffolds have been developed for urinary tract tissue-engineering applications. Naturally derived or synthetic materials have been tested to determine their properties and their effectiveness. However, the majority of the current literature focuses on the reconstruction of the urethra, urinary diversion, and urinary bladder, while limited data have been published regarding the use of biomaterials in ureteral reconstruction. Tissue engineering might offer alternative and less invasive therapeutic options for long ureteral defects compared with the current surgical reconstructive techniques and their potential complications. In this article, we aimed to review the literature regarding ureteral tissue engineering through a Medline search and describe new potential options for future clinical applications. We concluded that the available literature is inconclusive since the superiority of a specific scaffold has not been demonstrated and the latest developments of regenerative medicine have not been evaluated in ureteral tissue engineering yet.

Reconstruction of long ureteral defects often warrants the use of graft tissue and extensive surgical procedures to maintain the safe transport of urine from the kidneys to the urinary bladder. Complication risks, graft failure-related morbidity, and the lack of suitable tissue are major concerns. Tissue engineering might offer an alternative treatment approach in these cases, but ureteral tissue engineering is still an underreported topic in current literature. In this review, the most recent published data regarding ureteral tissue engineering are presented and evaluated, with a focus on cell sources, implantation strategies, and (bio)materials.

Abstract:Our objective was to compare the effect of tamsulosin versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the management of nocturia in previously untreated men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and no other predisposing factors for nocturia. The study group included 66 patients (mean age 68.9 years, range 52-81) randomized to receive either tamsulosin 0.4 mg per os daily (n = 33) or TURP (n = 33). Nocturia was assessed at baseline, after 3 months and after 1 year, by the number of nocturnal awakenings and hours of undisturbed sleep (HUS) obtained from a 72-h Frequency Volume Chart (FVC). Furthermore, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Nocturia (ICIQ-N) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Nocturia Quality of Life (ICIQ-NQoL) were recorded. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. ICIQNQoL and ICIQ-N scores correlated with the number of awakenings and HUS, respectively. Both tamsulosin and TURP improved all examined parameters during the follow up. TURP was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the number of nocturnal awakenings and in the IPSS, ICIQ-N and ICIQ-NQol scores in comparison with tamsulosin. HUS increased in both groups, but without any statistically significant difference. In conclusion, TURP is superior in comparison with tamsulosin for the management of BPH-related nocturia.