Cardio-oncology is a new field of interest in cardiology that focuses on the detection, monitoring, and treatment of cardiovascular disease occurring as a side effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Both cancer treatment modalities can cause cardiac dysfunction, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the oncologic population. It is necessary to periodically monitor cancer patients under treatment, especially those receiving anthracyclines and trastuzumab (monoclonal antibody), using mainly 3D echocardiography to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction and to estimate myocardial deformation. Additionally, measuring various biomarkers, such as natriuretic peptides, could facilitate early identification and appropriate response to potential cardiotoxicity. In this regard, cardiological assessment before starting cancer treatment is essential and should be continued throughout, since cardiac dysfunction can occur at any time, even several years after therapy onset. High-risk individuals, in particular, should receive a detailed management plan designed in collaboration between an oncology and a cardiology specialist. If heart failure develops, even in the absence of overt clinical symptoms, standard heart treatment is to be followed and causal agent discontinued if possible. One important question is whether and when to stop cardiac medication in case of heart dysfunction reversal, after completion of cancer treatment. Further cardio-oncology evolution can lead to a deeper understanding of the adverse mechanisms and effects causing heart failure, as well as the development of personalized treatment regimens in order to limit cardiotoxicity.

Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causes respiratory disease, it may also lead to cardiovascular involvement with unknown long-term consequences. The aim of our study was to evaluate prospectively cardiac involvement in patients after the recovery from Covid-19, using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. 100 Covid-19 recovered patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, were included, divided based upon clinical manifestation into two groups, those who were treated ambulant and those who were hospitalized. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation after their recovery. Although overall LV systolic function expressed by EF was normal, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) was significantly lower in Covid-19 recovered patients (33.28 ± 9.4 days after diagnosis) compared to controls (− 18.47 ± − 2.4 vs. − 21.07 ± − 1.76% respectively, p < 0.0001). Εspecially the lateral wall longitudinal strain (LATLS) and posterior wall longitudinal strain (POSTLS) were significantly reduced in all patients compared to controls (− 17.77 ± − 3.48 vs. − 20.97 ± − 2.86%, p < 0.0001 and − 19.52 ± − 5.3 vs. − 22.23 ± − 2.65%, p = 0.01). right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) was significantly diminished only in the hospitalized group of Covid-19 recovered patients, compared to controls (− 18.17 ± − 3.32 vs. − 26.03 ± − 4.55% respectively, p < 0.0001). LVGLS is affected in almost all individuals after Covid-19 infection independently of the infection severity, with LATLS being the most sensitive marker of LV impairment and with POSTLS to follow. RV shows impaired GLS in severely ill patients highlighting RVGLS as a helpful tool of prognosis. Recovered patients from Covid-19 infection have to be monitored for a long time, since the term “long Covid disease” might also include the cardiac function.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the correlation between severe aortic stenosis (sAS) and impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) in particular segments, using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with sAS and normal ejection fraction of left ventricle (LVEF). Methods: The study included 53 consecutive patients with asymptomatic sAS and preserved LVEF. The regional longitudinal systolic LV wall strain was evaluated at the area opposite of the aorta as the median strain value of the basal, middle, and apical segments of the lateral and posterior walls and was compared to the average strain value of the interventricular septum (IVS) at the same views. Results: LVGLS was decreased and was not statistically different between three- and four-chamber views (−12.5 ± 3.6 vs −11.4 ± 5.5%, p = 0.2). The average strain values of the lateral and posterior walls were statistically reduced compared to the average value of the IVS (lateral vs IVS: −7.8 ± 3.7 vs −10 ± 5.3%, p = 0.005, posterior vs IVS: −7.7 ± 4.2 vs −10.3 ± 3.8%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between lateral and posterior walls (−7.8 ± 3.7 vs −7.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.9). Conclusions: The strain of lateral and posterior walls of left ventricle, which lay just opposite to the aortic valve seem to be more reduced compared to other walls in patients with sAS and preserved LVEF possibly due to their anatomical position. This impairment seems to be the reason of the overall LVGLS reduction. Regional strain could be used as an extra tool for the estimation of the severity of AS as well as for prognostic information in asymptomatic patients.