Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to control pain, inflammation, and limit the cardinal signs of injury in humans. However, prolonged use of NSAIDs increases the risk of heart attack (myocardial infarction; MI) and the subsequent risk of heart and renal failure. The molecular and cellular mechanism of action for this adverse effect, particularly along the cardiorenal network, is incomplete. To define the mechanism, carprofen (CAP), an NSAID was administered at the dose of 5 mg/kg to C57BL/6 male mice for two weeks. After last dose of CAP treatment mice were subjected to permanent occlusion of coronary artery that induces irreversible cardiac remodeling while maintaining naive and MI-controls. After MI, cardiac pathology and dysfunction were confirmed, along with additional measurements of kidney function, histology, and injury markers, such as plasma creatinine. CAP treatment increased plasma creatinine levels and subsequently, myocardial structural disorganization increased. Kidney neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and protein expression were increased post-MI. After two weeks CAP treatment, the expression of pyrogenic pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β were increased compared to non-CAP treated mice, indicative of amplified inflammatory response. There was also evidence that renal injury of both the post-CAP treatment controls and post-CAP MI were much greater than the non-CAP treated naïve controls, as serum creatinine and NGAL levels were elevated along with obvious structural impairment of the glomerulus. Therefore, CAP treatment tampers with the acute inflammatory response that promotes cardiorenal syndrome and non-resolving inflammation post-MI in acute heart failure.

47 Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend that individuals with >10 adenomatous polyps, ≥2 hamartomatous polyps, or ≥5 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon have detailed risk assessment and potential genetic testing to rule out polyposis syndrome. Here, we describe germline testing of patients with a personal history of colorectal polyposis by Cancer Genetics Counseling Services. Methods: This is an IRB-approved retrospective chart-review study. Between 2016 and 2020, 1011 unique genetic counseling visits were conducted. Germline testing was recommended by a certified genetic counselor if medically necessary. All patients with a personal history of colorectal polyposis were identified (N=20) and their germline testing results were summarized. Results: The reasons for referral to the Cancer Genetics Counseling Services were personal history of >10 adenomatous polyps (N=13), personal and family history of colorectal polyposis (N=3), personal history of juvenile colorectal polyps (N=3) or personal history of ≥2 hamartomatous polyps (N=1). The median age is 58 years-old (1-84). Ten (50%) patients were females. Caucasians, African Americans and other ethnic backgrounds represented 80%, 10% and 10% respectively. In our cohort, 6 out of 20 (30%) patients had a pathogenic germline mutation, 5 (25%) patients had variant of unknown significance (VUS) and 9 (45%) patients had negative testing. Among patients with pathogenic germline mutations, 3 patients had a pathogenic APC mutation (APC c.1659G>A, APC c.2802C>A and APC c.1643dupT) and were diagnosed with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). One patient had 2 pathogenic MUTYH mutations (MUTYH c.536A>G and MUTYH c.1187G>A) and was diagnosed with One patient had a pathogenic PTEN c.634+5G>A mutation and was diagnosed with PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. Among the 3 patients with a personal history of juvenile colorectal polyps, one patient had a CHEK2 c.190G>A mutation while the other two had negative genetic test results. The VUS mutations in our cohort were MRE11A c.826C>T, BLM c.3478T>C, BRCA2 c.2519T>C, CHEK2 p.V395L and CTNNA1 c.392dupT. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with personal history of colorectal polyposis, the majority of patients (45%) had negative germline testing. An underlying pathogenic germline mutation and VUS were identified in 30% and 25% of the patients, respectively. FAP Syndrome was the most commonly diagnosed hereditary polyposis syndrome with 3 patients found to have APC germline mutations. Other pathogenic mutations were identified in the MUTYH, PTEN and CHEK2 genes. Patients with MUTYH and PTEN mutations were diagnosed with MAP and PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndromes respectively.

No abstract

46 Background: Genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC) include well-defined hereditary syndromes such as Lynch Syndrome, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis syndrome (FAP), MUTYH-Associated Polyposis syndrome (MAP) and other less common syndromes. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend that individuals meeting certain criteria have detailed risk assessment and potential genetic testing. Here, we describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with personal history of CRC evaluated by cancer genetics counseling services. Methods: This is an IRB-approved retrospective chart-review study. Between 2016 and 2020, 1011 unique genetic counseling visits were conducted. Germline testing was recommended by a certified genetic counselor if medically necessary. All patients with a personal history of CRC were identified (N = 52) and their clinical and molecular characteristics were summarized. Results: The median age is 50 years-old (29-82). Thirty-five (67%) patients were females. Caucasians, African Americans and other ethnic backgrounds represented 75%, 19% and 6% respectively. The primary tumor location was in the right colon, left colon and rectum in 29%, 37% and 27% of our cohort respectively. In 7%, the primary location of the tumor was not available. In our cohort, 11 out of 52 (21%) patients had a pathogenic germline mutation and 9 patients (17%) had a germline variant of unknown significance (VUS). Among patients with pathogenic germline mutations (N = 11), 4 patients had MSH2 mutations (MSH2 c.1759+1G > A, MSH2 c. 1687dupT, MSH2 c.1861C > T and MSH2 c.811_814delTCTG), 1 patient had a MSH6 mutation (MSH6 c.1012A > T), 1 patient had a PMS2 mutation (PMS2 c.2182_2184delACTinsG), 3 patients had CHEK2 mutations (CHEK2 c.1100delC and CHEK2 c.470T > C (p.I157T)), 2 patients had MUTYH mutations (MUTYH c.1187G > A and MUTYH c.536A > G) and 1 patient had a BRCA2 mutation (BRCA2 c.2808_2811delACAA). One patient had a CHEK2 and a MUTYH mutation. The VUS mutations in our cohort were POLE c.1645T > C, POLE c.5480C > T, c.2999G > A, MLH1 c.1628A > G, CTNNA1 c.503G > A, MSH2 c.128A > G, NBN c.16C > T, ATM c.6537T > G and AXIN2, BRCA1, NTHL1 mutations. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with personal history of CRC, the majority of patients (62%) had negative germline testing. An underlying pathogenic germline mutation and VUS were identified in 21% and 17% of the patients respectively. Lynch Syndrome was the most commonly diagnosed hereditary CRC syndrome with 6 out of 11 patients found to have MMR germline mutations. Other pathogenic mutations were identified in the CHEK2, MUTYH and BRCA2 genes.