No abstract

Previous studies have indicated that vertical root fracture tends to occur in a buccolingual direction, where dentin thickness is greatest. Factors potentially influencing the location and direction of root fracture include root canal shape, external root morphology, and dentin thickness. In this finite-element study, simulated root sections were varied systematically with respect to canal size and shape, external root morphology, and dentin thickness to determine their relative contribution to vertical root fracture. Similar models were constructed based on cross-sections of human tooth roots that had been fractured clinically or experimentally. Finite-element models demonstrated that canal curvature seems more important than external root morphology, in terms of stress concentration, and that reduced dentin thickness increases the magnitude but not the direction of maximum tensile stress. Models based on actual root fractures showed a strong similarity between tensile-stress distribution and fracture patterns.

Vertical root fracture seems to result from stresses generated within the root canal and typically occurs in a buccolingual direction through the thickest part of dentin. Because stresses in the canal wall are difficult to measure experimentally, we have attempted to correlate stress patterns derived from finite element models of maxillary and mandibular incisors with strain measurements on the root surfaces of extracted teeth. Finite element analysis indicated that circumferential tensile stresses were concentrated on the buccal and lingual surfaces of the canal wall, corresponding to areas of greatest canal wall curvature. Surface stresses were much lower and were consistently tensile on the proximal root surfaces but variable on the buccal and lingual surfaces. The measurement of root surface stresses does not provide a reliable picture of internal stresses in the root. Canal wall curvature is a major factor in stress concentration and hence in the pattern of fracture.

The aim of this study was to compare vertical forces at fracture of endodontically treated mandibular incisors obturated with different types of root canal sealer. Four groups of 10 teeth each were tested; group 1 served as positive and negative controls (five teeth each), and groups 2, 3, and 4 were obturated by lateral condensation with gutta-percha and AH Plus, Tubliseal, or Ketac-Endo, respectively. All teeth were loaded vertically using a plugger tip inserted into the canal space until fracture occurred; the load at fracture and the pattern of fracture were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Scheffé test at the 95% level of confidence. Force at fracture of roots obturated with Ketac-Endo was significantly higher than those obturated with AH Plus and Tubliseal. Most fracture lines were in a buccolingual direction. The results suggested that Ketac-Endo strengthens endodontically treated roots and may be used for weak roots, which are likely to be susceptible to vertical root fracture.