Language barriers have been reported to have a detrimental effect on various outcomes in paediatric care, such as therapy adherence, and may even cause medical treatment errors. To address this issue, we developed a set of 63 cards with which a wide range of specific messages can be conveyed nonverbally in a clinical context. The conceptualization of the tool involved multiple phases. In Study 1, we held a workshop with 11 children and adolescents between 8 and 19 years that had received treatment for oncological conditions to gain an understanding of the specific challenges. In Study 2, we presented a first prototype to 3 children and 14 adults; participants were asked to rate the cards on multiple dimensions. Based on information from the previous trials, we developed a second prototype and asked 10 children and 7 adults to rate the cards on multiple dimensions. In this multidisciplinary approach in addition to our experts of clinical psychology we involved patient advocators and graphic designers in the process to achieve high feasibility and comprehensibility; based on the workshop, expert consensus surveys, data gathered in evaluation, all prototypes and the final card set were developed in close collaboration. Participants had little difficulty interpreting the cards and rated the information content as adequate. Importantly, a majority of participants indicated that they would keep using the tool during their stay at the hospital. Overall, the evaluation implied high acceptance and usability. The final card set is a promising communication tool in clinical paediatric settings with various language barriers. Further research should address how patient outcomes are impacted by using the tool.

Background Psychosocial guidelines and standards systematically describe stressors and resources in particularly challenging situations and hence serve as a basis for interventions to achieve defined psychosocial goals. Despite fundamental principles and guidelines for psychosocial methods, the quality of provided care varies considerably depending on setting, provision, and profession. The purpose of the present protocol is to illustrate the development and evaluation of the standardized psychological intervention “My Logbook”, a practical guide accompanying children through all stages of treatment by directly translating current quality standards of psychosocial care into practice. Methods In an evidence-based set-up, using face-to-face discussions and telephone conferences, a multi-professional team of local experts decide on critical disease-related issues, structure, content (information and intervention elements) and design of the quality improvement tool. Via delphi surveys an extended expert team is asked to rate the content, method, and design of all booklets which is concluded by a final agreement by the specialist group for quality assurance of the psychosocial working group in the Society for Pediatric Oncology (PSAPOH). The developed tools are piloted in an international multicenter study to evaluate the patient-reported outcome and feasibility and to integrate practical views of patients, as well as psychosocial and interdisciplinary professionals into the further development of the “My Logbook”. Discussion The iterative development of the “My Logbook” including local and international experts as well as the patient and practical perspective allow for the design of a process-oriented, consensus – and evidence-based tool directly translating the S3-Guideline into clinical practice. Feasibility and applicability are fostered through an iterative process of constant evaluation and adaptation of the tool by international experts and through the clinical experience gathered in the multi-centered pilot study. Furthermore, the systematic evaluation of the tool by patients, psychosocial, and interdisciplinary professionals enables the identification of persisting gaps between evidence-based standards and clinical practice, discrepancies between the various stakeholders’ perspectives as well as regional differences in feasibility, thereby directly linking practice and research. The preliminary results emphasize that psychological support can be standardized, enabling an evaluation and optimization of psychosocial care which future studies need to assess in multicenter clinical randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The occurrence of neuropsychological late effects in childhood brain tumor patients is well known in literature and practice, as well as the use of neuropsychological testing and therapy procedures. Despite guidelines, actual care is quite heterogeneous and often does not meet the needs due to lack of resources. Therefore, a standardized tool to improve awareness of and access to neuropsychological assessment, but even more treatment was developed. METHODS: The core of this Quality-Improvement project is a multilevel and interdisciplinary approach characterized by iterative processes (PDSA-cycles): (1) conceptualization by interdisciplinary, multicenter teams of experts, (2) consensus in Delphi surveys by medical, nursing and psychosocial experts (N=45) and final approval by the steering group. (3) Pilot phases (N=44): Manageability and acceptance, emotional well-being and the degree of information were recorded using a process-oriented screening. RESULTS: The expert meetings resulted in two booklets ("Look closely - Psychosocial assessment" & "1,2,3 - All about Neuropsychology"): Each booklet offers creative methods with a high prompting character to motivate the child to participate actively in two face-to-face sessions (psychoeducational, work and exercise and reflection section). They enable patients to make themselves experts on these topics with age-appropriate, interactive methods. The Delphi survey revealed a consensus of 69%-93%. Patients using the Psychosocial-assessment booklet showed generally low negative emotions and stable positive emotions, which significantly increased during the second session (Z = 2.156, p = .031). Moreover, positive emotions increase significantly during the second session (Z = 2.805, p = .005). Self-indicated degree of information increases significantly with both booklets (Psychosocial assessment: Z = 3.133, p = .002; Neuropsychology: Z = 2.751, p = .006). CONCLUSION: The results illustrate a positive emotional approach to neuropsychological assessment and treatment. Likewise, the rapid increase in expert knowledge supports access to this specific topic and can be considered a minimum standard.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence has supported alternatives to sedation and general anesthesia for increasing treatment compliance of children during MRI examinations. Particularities in children with a brain tumor (frequency of examinations, neuropsychological deficits (attention, memory)) have a significant impact on methods of treatment and are given special consideration in this study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of an MRI training program and to investigate the moderating factors for successful MRI examination for a group of young patients with pediatric brain tumors and/or NF1 and (2) to examine the effect of the training on the patient’s well-being. METHODS: A total of 87 in the retrospective analyses (Study 1) and a subgroup of 17 patients in the prospective analyses (Study 2, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04474678) of the neuro-oncology unit with a mean age of 6.83 years underwent a two-step program to prepare children for MRI, including an in vitro strategy training inside the scanner and were recorded using a process-oriented screening. RESULTS: 81 % of the children who had received MRI training managed to successfully undergo the MRI scan. Hence, the rate of successful MRI examinations without anesthesia was almost five times as high in the group that received MRI training compared to the group that did not. Memory, attentional difficulties and hyperactivity were significant neuropsychological moderators for successful or unsuccessful scanning. Furthermore, the training was effective in improving the psychological well-being of the patients. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the MRI training is an effective alternative to sedation of young patients for MRI examinations and a promising tool for improving patient well-being related to the diagnostic procedure. However, the intervention needs to be customized according to the children’s individual neuropsychological difficulties, which requires specialized psychological staff and an interdisciplinary approach.