Abstract. RHC 3024 has been investigated for its antiallergic activity in three in vitro models of anaphylaxis. We have also compared its activity profile in these models with that of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) and other antiallergic agents. As an inhibitor of antigen-induced release of histamine from rat mast cells RHC 3024 was 4 times more potent than DSCG. In the same model the activity profile of RHC 3024 was identical to that of DSCG in the following respects: loss of inhibitory activity with increasing preincubation time, reversibility of the inhibition, tachyphylaxis and cross-tachyphylaxis to each other and inability to inhibit histamine release stimulated by Ca++ ionophore, dextran/phosphatidyl serine and compound 48/80. Both drugs had no effect in the other two models, IgG|-mediated histamine release from guinea pig lung and anti-IgE-induced histamine release from human basophils. We conclude: (1) RHC 3024 is a potent inhibitor of mediator release with a me chanism of action similar to that of DSCG, M&B 22,948, PRD-92-Ea and AH-7725 and (2) the in vitro activity profiles of proxicromil, doxantrazole, ICI 74,917 and WY-16,922 are different from DSCG and RHC 3024.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

A series of 26 compounds belonging to the chemical class of (1,2,4)triazolo(4,3-a)-quinoxaline-1,4-diones have been investigated for their antiallergic activities in 3 in vitro models of anaphylaxis. Effects of these and other known antiallergic agents on cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (cNUC-PDE) from purified rat mast cells have also been investigated. 18 compounds were potent (I₅₀ ≤ 45 μM) inhibitors of antigen-induced release of histamine (AIR) from rat mast cells (RMC), 3 compounds inhibited anti-IgE-induced release of histamine from human basophils (I₅₀ ≤ 25 μM) and none of the compounds significantly affected AIR from guinea pig lung slices. 13 of the compounds were more potent than theophylline as inhibitors of cyclic AMP-PDE and/or cyclic GMP-PDE from RMC. Parallel concentration-response curves for the inhibition of cyclic AMP-PDE and cyclic GMP-PDE indicated that these compounds probably interact with enzyme in the same manner. Paired regression analysis of the I₅₀ values for inhibition of AIR and cNUC-PDE from RMC by these compounds revealed no statistically significant correlation between the inhibition of AIR and inhibition of cyclic AMP-PDE or cyclic GMP-PDE. We conclude: (1) some of these compounds are potent inhibitors of immunologic release of histamine from RMC with an in vitro activity profile similar to that of DSCG, and (2) inhibition of cyclic AMP or cyclic GMP hydrolysis by cNUD-PDE by these compounds, DSCG, and 6 known antiallergic agents is not the biochemical mechanism by which they inhibit AIR from RMC.