Elution from polymer-based dental filling materials may have a potential impact on the biocompatibility of the materials. Since information from the manufacturers about ingredients in the materials often is incomplete, analyses of eluates from the materials are necessary for a better knowledge about possible harmful compounds. The aim of this study was to identify organic eluates from polymerized samples of two composites, one compomer and one resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Samples were immersed in ethanol or Ringer's solution. Organic leachables were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Identification was confirmed with reference substances, if available. Among components detected were monomers, co-monomers, initiators, stabilizers, decomposition products and contaminants. Thirty-two substances were identified and 17 were confirmed with reference substances. From elution in Ringer's we identified 13 eluates from Tetric Ceram, 10 from Z250, 21 from Dyract and six from Fuji II LC; HEMA, HC and CQ were found in all samples. From elution in ethanol 12 eluates from Tetric Ceram, 18 eluates from Z250, 19 from Dyract and 10 from Fuji II LC were identified. The diversity of eluates from the four materials under study is demonstrated. Owing to variation between the materials, the biocompatibility including the allergenic potential may be different.

No abstract

No abstract

Resin-based dental restorative materials contain allergenic methacrylate monomers, which may be released into saliva after restorative treatment. Monomers from resin-based composite materials have been demonstrated in saliva in vitro; however, studies analyzing saliva after restorative therapy are scarce. The aim of this study was to quantify methacrylate monomers in saliva after treatment with a resin-based composite filling material. Saliva was collected from 10 patients at four start points--before treatment, and 10 min, 24 h, and 7 d after treatment--and analysed by combined chromatography/mass spectrometry. The monomers bisphenol-A diglycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) were detected and quantified in the samples collected shortly (10 min) after treatment. The amounts detected ranged from 0.028 to 9.65 μg ml(-1) for Bis-GMA, from 0.015 to 0.19 μg ml(-1) for HEMA, and from 0.004 to 1.2 μg ml(-1) for UDMA. Triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) was detected in four of the samples. Ethoxylated bisphenol-A dimethacrylate (Bis-EMA) was not detected. Monomers were not detected in saliva samples collected before treatment, or 24 h or 7 d after treatment, with the exception of one sample, 24 h after treatment, in which HEMA was detected. In conclusion, monomers from the investigated resin-based composite and adhesive system were present in saliva shortly after treatment. One week after treatment, no monomers could be detected in patients' saliva samples.