Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-based techniques are developing fast in facial reconstruction and osteosynthesis. Patient-specific implant (PSI) production is already sufficiently fast for everyday use and can be utilized even for primary trauma surgery such as orbital floor reconstruction after blowout fracture. Purpose of our study is to retrospectively analyze the 3-dimensional (3D) success of PSI reconstructions of orbital floor fractures in our unit. The authors analyzed retrospectively a 1-year cohort (n = 8) of orbital floor blow-out fractures that have been reconstructed using virtual surgical plan and CAD-CAM PSI. Postoperative computed topographies of patients were compared to their original virtual surgical plans. The 3D outcome and fitting of the PSI was good in all patients. Mean error for 3D position of the PSI was 1.3 to 1.8 mm (range 0.4 to 4.8 mm) and postoperative orbital volume was successfully restored in all of the patients. Use of CAD-CAM PSI for reconstruction of orbital floor blow out fracture is reliable method and thus recommended.

Background When postoperative multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging of patients with craniosynostosis is used, it is usually performed a few days after surgery in a radiology department. This requires additional anesthesia for the patient. Recently, intraoperative mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT) devices have gained popularity for orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, which allows postoperative CT imaging in the operating room. Objective This single-center retrospective study compared radiation dose and image quality of postoperative imaging performed using conventional MSCT scanners and O-arm CBCT. Materials and methods A total of 104 pediatric syndromic and non-syndromic patients who were operated on because of single- or multiple-suture craniosynostosis were included in this study. The mean volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) values of optimized craniosynostosis CT examinations (58 MSCT and 46 CBCT) were compared. Two surgeons evaluated the subjective image quality. Results CBCT resulted in significantly lower CTDIvol (up to 14%) and DLP (up to 33%) compared to MSCT. Multi-slice CT image quality was considered superior to CBCT scans. However, all scans were considered to be of sufficient quality for diagnosis. Conclusion The O-arm device allowed for an immediate postoperative CBCT examination in the operating theater using the same anesthesia induction. Radiation exposure was lower in CBCT compared to MSCT scans, thus further encouraging the use of O-arms. Cone-beam CT imaging with an O-arm is a feasible method for postoperative craniosynostosis imaging, yielding less anesthesia to patients, lower health costs and the possibility to immediately evaluate results of the surgical operation.