Topical ocular drug bioavailability is notoriously poor, in the order of 5% or less. This is a consequence of effective multiple barriers to drug entry, comprising nasolacrimal drainage, epithelial drug transport barriers and clearance from the vasculature in the conjunctiva. While sustained drug delivery to the back of the eye is now feasible with intravitreal implants such as Vitrasert ™ (~6 months), Retisert ™ (~3 years) and Iluvien ™ (~3 years), currently there are no marketed delivery systems for long-term drug delivery to the anterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this article is to summarize the resurgence in interest to prolong and improve drug entry from topical administration. These approaches include mucoadhesives, viscous polymer vehicles, transporter-targeted prodrug design, receptor-targeted functionalized nanoparticles, iontophoresis, punctal plug and contact lens delivery systems. A few of these delivery systems might be useful in treating diseases affecting the back of the eye. Their effectiveness will be compared against intravitreal implants (upper bound of effectiveness) and trans-scleral systems (lower bound of effectiveness). Refining the animal model by incorporating the latest advances in microdialysis and imaging technology is key to expanding the knowledge central to the design, testing and evaluation of the next generation of innovative ocular drug delivery systems.The current ophthalmology market is primarily driven by age-and lifestyle-related diseases, such as macular degeneration, cataracts, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. Dry eye syndrome, inflammation and ocular allergies are also contributing significantly. Traditionally, antiglaucoma products held the major market share. Driven by demographic trends such as an increase in aged population and lifestyle factors, the overall market for ophthalmic therapeutics is expected to undergo considerable and consistent growth during the next decade. In the USA, cases of visual impairment and blindness due to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) are expected to increase from 620,000 cases in 2010 to 1.7 million in 2050 [1]. While therapeutic agents are currently available for treating only the wet form of ARMD, new treatments are anticipated in the future for treating the more prevalent dry form of ARMD [2]. The global ophthalmic pharmaceutical market with registered sales of US$14 billion in 2009, is forecasted to grow at a double digit rate [3].
Our findings suggest that PLGA nanoparticle uptake in primary cultured rabbit conjunctival epithelial cells occurs most likely by adsorptive-type endocytosis.
The current BSC guidance issued by the FDA allows for biowaivers based on conservative criteria. Possible new criteria and class boundaries are proposed for additional biowaivers based on the underlying physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. The proposed changes in new class boundaries for solubility and permeability are as follows: 1. Narrow the required solubility pH range from 1.0-7.5 to 1.0-6.8. 2. Reduce the high permeability requirement from 90% to 85%. The following new criterion and potential biowaiver extension require more research: 1. Define a new intermediate permeability class boundary. 2. Allow biowaivers for highly soluble and intermediately permeable drugs in IR solid oral dosage forms with no less than 85% dissolved in 15 min in all physiologically relevant dissolution media, provided these IR products contain only known excipients that do not affect the oral drug absorption. The following areas require more extensive research: 1. Increase the dose volume for solubility classification to 500 mL. 2. Include bile salt in the solubility measurement. 3. Use the intrinsic dissolution method for solubility classification. 4. Define an intermediate solubility class for BCS Class II drugs. 5. Include surfactants in in vitro dissolution testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.