Cochlear implantation can be successfully performed in children with inner ear malformations. These children and their parents can expect significant auditory benefits from this intervention. The various types of inner ear malformations may have quite different prognoses for good auditory performance.

Cochlear implants are indicated for elderly patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss (sensorineural hearing loss >/=70 dB). Their use has been limited, possibly by the misconception that elderly patients will perform poorly. To document the performance of older adults (> or =65 years old), we undertook a retrospective analysis of our postlingually deafened adult patients who underwent implantation with the CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant and underwent formal audiologic analysis (sentence recognition [Central Institute for the Deaf, CID] and monosyllabic word recognition (consonant-noun-consonant, CNC)). Both younger (n = 20; mean age = 46.9 years) and older (n = 16; mean age = 71.5 years) adults showed statistically significant increases in CID and CNC scores after cochlear implantation. No statistically significant difference could be detected in operative time, anesthesia time, length of hospitalization, or CID or CNC scores between the two age groups. We conclude that age should not be a criterion for deciding who should receive cochlear implants.

Preservation of hearing was attempted in 161 cases of histologically confirmed acoustic neuroma removed by the senior author between January 1, 1970, and September 30, 1991. There were 136 patients with unilateral tumors; 22 patients had bilateral tumors (neurofibromatosis 2) and underwent a total of 25 procedures. Hearing was initially preserved in 35% of patients with unilateral tumors and in 44% of those with bilateral tumors. Results are reported in terms of pre- and postoperative pure tone average and speech discrimination scores. Surgical access to the tumor was obtained via middle cranial fossa and suboccipital approaches. The latter has been used more often over the past 5 years because of a lower associated incidence of transient facial paresis. Persistent postoperative headaches have been the most common complication following the suboccipital approach. The results of preoperative brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) studies were useful in predicting the outcome of hearing preservation attempts. Patients with intact BAER waveform morphology and normal or delayed latencies had a higher probability of hearing preservation in comparison to those with abnormal preoperative BAER morphology.

The transmastoid facial recess approach has become the standard technique for cochlear implantation. Although this approach has been used for implantation in patients with common cavity deformities, it is not without increased risk to the facial nerve. Using a direct approach to the common cavity that circumvents the facial recess, we have successfully implanted four patients with common cavity deformities. An aberrant facial nerve in one patient would have precluded placement of the electrode array using standard cochlear implant techniques. As demonstrated in these four patients, the direct approach to the common cavity is an effective approach for placement of the electrode array, minimizes risk to the facial nerve, and may decrease the likelihood of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Intraoperative video footage demonstrates the feasibility and facility of this approach in patients with common cavity deformities.

No abstract