Background: Leakage of the esophago-gastrostomy after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction is a serious complication. Anastomotic leakage occurs in up to 20% of patients and a compromised perfusion of the gastric tube is thought to play an important role. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether arterial calcification is a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in esophageal surgery. Method: Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane databases and Google scholar databases were systematically searched for studies that assessed arterial calcification of the thoracic aorta, celiac axis including its branches, or the superior mesenteric artery in patients that underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. The degree of calcification was classified as absent, minor or major. A "random-effects model" was used to calculate pooled Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I 2-test. Results: From the 456 articles retrieved, seven studies were selected including 1.860 patients. The median (range) of anastomotic leakage was 17.2% (12.7e24.8). Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant association between increased calcium score and anastomotic leakage for the thoracic aorta (OR 2.18(CI 1.42e3.34)), celiac axis (OR 1.62(CI 1.15e2.29)) and right post-celiac axis (common hepatic, gastroduodenal and right gastroepiploic arteries) (OR 2.69(CI 1.27e5.72)). Heterogeneity was observed for analysis on calcification of the thoracic aorta and celiac axis (I 2 ¼ 71% and 59%, respectively) but not for the right branches of the celiac axis (I 2 ¼ 0%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis, including good quality studies, showed a statistically significant association between arterial calcification and anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Background:The aim of the present study is to present the three years follow-up a randomised controlled trial that compared Hartmann's Procedure (HP) with sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis (with or without defunctioning ileostomy) (PA) in a randomised design to determine the optimal treatment strategy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Methods: Data were prospectively gathered for the first 12 months after randomization and retrospectively collected up to 36 months. The primary long-term endpoint was stoma free rate 36 months after the index procedure. Secondary outcomes were patients with a stoma at 36 months, percentage of stoma reversals, related reinterventions, parastomal/incisional hernia rates, total in hospital days including all readmissions regardless their relation to the intervention, overall morbidity and mortality. Results: Three years follow-up was completed in 119 of the originally 130 included patients, with 57 (48%) in the PA-group and 62 (52%) patients in the HP-group. 36 months stoma free rate was significantly better for patients undergoing PA compared with HP (PA 92% vs HP 81%, hazard ratio 2.326 [95% CI 1.538-3.517]; log-rank p < 0⋅0001). Stoma reversal rates did not significantly differ (PA 31/40(78%) versus HP 45/61(74%), p = 0.814). Overall cumulative morbidity (PA 21/57(36%) versus HP 30/62(48%), p = 0.266) and mortality (PA 6/57(11%) versus HP 7/62 (11%), p = 1.000) did not differ between groups. However, more parastomal hernias occurred in the HP-group (HP 10/62(16%) vs PA 1/57(2%), p = 0.009) and the mean total in hospital days after three years follow-up was significantly lower in the PA-group compared to the HP-group (PA 14 days (IQR 9.5-22.5) versus HP 17 days (IQR 12.5-27.5)), p = 0.025). Conclusion: Long-term results showed that in haemodynamically stable, immunocompetent patients primary anastomosis is superior to Hartmann's procedure as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with respect to longterm stoma free rate, overall hospitalization and parastomal hernias.

No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Background This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial. Methods Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group. Results Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan–Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy. Conclusion Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option. Graphical abstract