No abstract

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become a treatment option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PMs) from gastrointestinal malignancies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate our most recent data regarding pulmonary complications (respiratory distress, pleural effusion, and pneumonia) and attempt to identify risk factors associated with this management plan. This study includes the most recent 4-year experience with appendiceal and colorectal carcinomatosis patients treated in a uniform manner between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009. A prospective morbidity and mortality database was maintained and pulmonary adverse events were analyzed with special attention to subphrenic peritonectomy. There were 147 consecutive patients with a mean age of 49.9 years. Fourteen patients (10%) presented grades I–IV pulmonary complications for a total of 26 events. The peritonectomy of right upper quadrant was performed in 74% and right plus left in 49% of the patients. Statistically, there were no more pulmonary complications among patients submitted to peritoneal stripping of right or right and left hemidiaphragm as compared to no subdiaphragmatic peritonectomy (P = 1.00 and P = 0.58, resp.). In an analysis of 18 quantitative indicators and clinical variables with pulmonary adverse events, only blood replacement greater than six units showed a significant correlation (P = 0.0062). Pulmonary adverse events were observed in 10% of patients having CRS and HIPEC. Subphrenic peritonectomy was not a specific risk factor for developing these adverse events.

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a viabilidade de abreviação do jejum em cirurgias colorretais oncológicas, bem como, o impacto no desfecho cirúrgico dos pacientes. Métodos: estudo prospectivo comparativo randomizado com pacientes submetidos à cirurgias eletivas colorretais, por câncer, no período de maio a setembro de 2017. Os pacientes foram randomizados eletronicamente em dois grupos de acordo com o jejum pré-operatório a ser adotado: convencional ou abreviado. Resultados: dos 33 pacientes incluídos, 15 seguiram o protocolo de jejum abreviado e 18 de jejum convencional. Ambos os grupos apresentaram perfis comparáveis. Nenhum paciente foi submetido a preparo mecânico do cólon. Em 69,7% dos casos, a cirurgia envolveu dissecção baixa do reto. Os procedimentos foram equivalentes em relação às variáveis intraoperatórias e complicações graves. O tempo para atingir realimentação plena foi menor para o jejum abreviado (10 versus 16 dias, p=0,001), assim como, o tempo de internação hospitalar (2 versus 4 dias, p=0,009). Os custos hospitalares foram menores no jejum abreviado (331 versus 682 reais, p<0,001). A análise univariável revelou correlação entre a realimentação plena e o jejum abreviado [HR 0,29 (IC95%: 0,12-0,68] e com a distensão abdominal [HR 0,12(IC95%: 0,01-0,94)]. Após análise multivariável, o jejum abreviado apresentou menor tempo para realimentação plena [HR 0,39(IC95%: 0,16-0,92]. Conclusão: o jejum pré-operatório abreviado favorece a recuperação metabólico-nutricional, diminuindo o tempo para realimentação plena. A implantação do protocolo de abreviação do jejum reduz custos de internação hospitalar.

Objectives: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. Methods: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. Conclusions: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.