Introduction Tumor budding is defined as a cluster of cells that invade the stroma. This has recently been studied to be associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and poor overall survival (OS) rate. The reliability and reproducibility of this histopathological feature make it a valid prognostic indicator in tongue carcinomas, which often have an unpredictable prognosis. The objective of this study was to group the studies that elucidate the prognostic role of tumor budding in tongue cancers. Methods A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies that reported tumor budding in tongue cancer. The relevant articles were independently screened by two authors for selection and data extraction. As a result, a list of such studies, clinical trials, and references, published in English up to March 2020, was obtained, and a total of 1448 patients in nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Results A higher tumor budding score was significantly correlated with LNM (hazard ratio (HR): 3.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-4.52; p≤.00001) and poor OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.84-3.14; p≤.00001) in tongue cancer. Conclusions Our present study demonstrates that tumor budding is an independent predictor of LNM and OS in tongue cancer. Tumor budding should be considered a parameter in future oncological staging systems.
The lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes harvested during surgery. The objective of this article is to investigate the efficacy of LNR as a prognostic indicator of survival in pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone surgery by meta-analysis. Methods A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies that reported LNR in pancreatic cancer. Two authors independently screened the relevant articles for selection and to extract data. All studies published in English up to April 2020 were obtained, and a total of 17,128 node-positive patients in 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. RevMan software 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for conducting all statistical analyses. Results This meta-analysis demonstrated that LNR > 0.2 significantly correlated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.74-1.94; p ≤ 0.00001) in node-positive pancreatic cancer patients. Conclusions Our findings have demonstrated that a higher LNR is a predictor of poor survival and that LNR serves as an independent prognostic marker for assessing survival using a cutoff of 20%.
Aim: To ascertain the prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) observed in patients of tongue squamous cell carcinoma with magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and methods: In this retrospective observational study, records of 144 patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed SCC of tongue were considered. Preoperative MRI study, demographic and clinical data were reviewed. Based on MRI reports, patients were categorised into: with or without the presence of cervical node necrosis (CNN or non CNN). Subsequent treatments, histopathological reports and follow up data were studied to determine key prognostic elements, overall survival and disease free survival by statistical analysis. Results: The incidence of CNN was 55.55% in the study sample. CNN category, depth of invasion, N stage and extra nodal extension were significant negative prognostic factors for overall and disease free survival. Conclusion: Based on our results, pre operative MRI based presence of cervical node necrosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma is an independent prognostic indicator for poor overall and disease free survival. Long term prospective studies with larger cohorts could be undertaken to establish its role as an important biomarker for precision treatments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.