Background Ehrlichiosis is a clinically important, emerging zoonosis. Only Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii have been thought to cause ehrlichiosis in humans in the United States. Patients with suspected ehrlichiosis routinely undergo testing to ensure proper diagnosis and to ascertain the cause. Methods We used molecular methods, culturing, and serologic testing to diagnose and ascertain the cause of cases of ehrlichiosis. Results On testing, four cases of ehrlichiosis in Minnesota or Wisconsin were found not to be from E. chaffeensis or E. ewingii and instead to be caused by a newly discovered ehrlichia species. All patients had fever, malaise, headache, and lymphopenia; three had thrombocytopenia; and two had elevated liver-enzyme levels. All recovered after receiving doxycycline treatment. At least 17 of 697 Ixodes scapularis ticks collected in Minnesota or Wisconsin were positive for the same ehrlichia species on polymerase-chain-reaction testing. Genetic analyses revealed that this new ehrlichia species is closely related to E. muris. Conclusions We report a new ehrlichia species in Minnesota and Wisconsin and provide supportive clinical, epidemiologic, culture, DNA-sequence, and vector data. Physicians need to be aware of this newly discovered close relative of E. muris to ensure appropriate testing, treatment, and regional surveillance. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)

No abstract

Context.—Endoscopic brush cytology is a valuable technique for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancy. Despite its widespread use, the sensitivity of this method has been reported as approximately 50%. The specificity is usually higher than 95%. Few reports have systematically analyzed the reasons for this relatively low sensitivity. Objectives.—To determine the rate and reasons for false-negative diagnoses in endoscopic brushing cytology of biliary and pancreatic ducts based on the results of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values. Design.—Retrospective analysis of laboratory data and slide review of false-negative cases. Setting.—Two tertiary care state university hospitals. Patients.—A total of 183 pancreatobiliary brushing specimens obtained from patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary or pancreatic duct disease for a 4- to 5-year period. Intervention.—Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brushings. Main Outcome Measures.—Determination of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values. Analysis of false-negative results. Results.—The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values, overall, were 48%, 98%, 79%, 92%, and 76%, respectively. Sampling error was a major cause of false-negative diagnoses (67%), followed by interpretive (17%) and technical errors (17%). Conclusions.—Improvements in sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for cancer of the pancreatobiliary tract can be achieved by optimizing slide preparatory techniques. Also, enhancement of the cytologist's diagnostic skills enables the identification of the morphologic features of premalignant lesions. Repeat brushings are indicated for suspicious or negative results not consistent with the clinical or radiologic findings.

No abstract

No abstract