Information on the clinical traits associated with bronchial neutrophilia in asthma is scant, preventing its recognition and adequate treatment. We aimed to assess the clinical, functional and biological features of neutrophilic asthma and identify possible predictors of bronchial neutrophilia.The inflammatory phenotype of 70 mild-to-severe asthma patients was studied cross-sectionally based on the eosinophilic/neutrophilic counts in their bronchial lamina propria. Patients were classified as neutrophilic or non-neutrophilic. Neutrophilic asthma patients (neutrophil count cut-off: 47.17 neutrophils·mm−2; range: 47.17–198.11 neutrophils·mm−2; median: 94.34 neutrophils·mm−2) were further classified as high (≥94.34 neutrophils·mm−2) or intermediate (47.17– <94.34 neutrophils·mm−2). The effect of smoking ≥10 pack-years was also assessed.Neutrophilic asthma patients (n=38; 36 mixed eosinophilic/neutrophilic) had greater disease severity, functional residual capacity, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and exacerbations, and lower forced vital capacity (FVC) % pred and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) reversibility than non-neutrophilic asthma patients (n=32; 28 eosinophilic and four paucigranulocytic). Neutrophilic asthma patients had similar eosinophil counts, increased bronchial CD8+, interleukin (IL)-17-F+ and IL-22+ cells, and decreased mast cells compared with non-neutrophilic asthma patients. FEV1 and FVC reversibility were independent predictors of bronchial neutrophilia in our cohort. High neutrophilic patients (n=21) had increased serum IgE levels, sensitivity to perennial allergens, exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid dependence, and CD4+ and IL-17F+ cells in their bronchial mucosa. Excluding smokers revealed increased IL-17A+ and IL-22+ cells in highly neutrophilic patients.We provide new evidence linking the presence of high bronchial neutrophilia in asthma to an adaptive immune response associated with allergy (IgE) and IL-17/22 cytokine expression. High bronchial neutrophilia may discriminate a new endotype of asthma. Further research is warranted on the relationship between bronchoreversibility and bronchial neutrophilia.

We hypothesized that Nandrolone (ND)-abuse induces cardiac hypertrophy, increases myocardial susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and reduces responsiveness to postconditioning (PostC) cardioprotection. Wistar-rats were ND-treated for 2-weeks (short_ND) or 10-weeks (long_ND). Vehicle-treated rats served as controls. Hearts were retrogradely perfused and left ventricular pressure (LVP) was measured before and after 30-min global ischemia. In subgroups of hearts, to induce cardioprotection a PostC protocol (five cycles of 10-s reperfusion and 10-s ischemia) was performed. β-adrenoreceptors, kinases (Akt and GSk-3β) and phosphatases (PP2A sub A and PP2A sub B) were examined by Western blot before and after ischemia. After 120-min reperfusion infarct-size was measured. Short_ND slightly increased cardiac/body weight ratio, but did not affect cardiac baseline nor post-ischemic contractile function or infarct-size when compared to vehicle hearts. However, PostC limited cardiac dysfunction much more in short_ND hearts than other groups. Although cardiac/body weight ratio markedly increased after long_ND, baseline LVP was not affected. Yet, post-ischemic contracture and infarct-size were exacerbated and PostC was unable to reduce infarct-size and ventricular dysfunction. While short_ND increased phosphatases, non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated Akt, long_ND reduced phosphatase-expression and Akt-phosphorylation. Both short_ND and long_ND had no effect on the GSK-3β-phosphorylation but increased the expression of β 2 -adrenoreceptors. In reperfusion, PostC increased Akt-phosphorylation regardless of protective effects, but reduced phosphataseexpression in protected hearts only. In conclusion: short_ND improves post-ischemic myocardial performance in postconditioned hearts. However, long_ND increases myocardial susceptibility to I/R injury and abolishes cardioprotection by PostC. This increased susceptibility might be related to steroid-induced hypertrophy and/or to altered enzyme expression/phosphorylation.

Dupilumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody, capable of inhibiting intracellular signaling of both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. These are two molecules that, together with other proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-5 and eotaxins, play a pivotal role in orchestrating the airway inflammatory response defined as Type 2 (T2) inflammation, driven by Th2 or Type 2 innate lymphoid cells, which is the major feature of the T2 high asthma phenotype. The dual inhibition of IL-4 and IL-13 activities is due to the blockade of type II IL-4 receptor through the binding of dupilumab with the subunit IL-4Rα. This results in the repression of STAT6 and in the suppression of subsequent de novo formation of several molecules involved in the T2 inflammatory signature. Several clinical trials tested the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in large populations of uncontrolled severe asthmatics, revealing significant improvements in lung function, asthma control, and exacerbation rate. Similar results were reported when dupilumab was employed in patients harboring pathogenetic processes related to T2 immune response, such as atopic dermatitis and chronic rhinosinusitis. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent research in the field of respiratory medicine about dupilumab mechanism of action and its effects.

Introduction There is, so far, no universal definition of severe asthma. This definition usually relies on: number of exacerbations, inhaled therapy, need for oral corticosteroids, and respiratory function. The use of such parameters varies in the different definitions used. Thus, according to the parameters chosen, each patient may result in having severe asthma or not. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the choice of a specific definition of severe asthma can change the allocation of patients. Methods Data collected from the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) registry were analyzed. All the patients included were then reclassified according to the definitions of U-BIOPRED, NICE, WHO, ATS/ERS, GINA, ENFUMOSA, and TENOR. Results 540 patients, were extracted from the SANI database. We observed that 462 (86%) met the ATS/ERS criteria as well as the GINA criteria, 259 (48%) the U-Biopred, 222 (41%) the NICE, 125 (23%) the WHO, 313 (58%) the Enfumosa, and 251 (46%) the TENOR criteria. The mean eosinophil value were similar in the ATS/ERS, U-Biopred, and Enfumosa (528, 532 and 516 cells/mcl), higher in WHO and Tenor (567 and 570 cells/mcl) and much higher in the NICE classification (624 cells/mcl). Lung function tests resulted similarly in all groups, with WHO (67%) and ATS/ERS-GINA (73%), respectively, showing the lower and upper mean FEV1 values. Conclusions The present observations clearly evidence the heterogeneity in the distribution of patients when different definitions of severe asthma are used. However, the recent definition of severe asthma, provided by the GINA document, is similar to that indicated in 2014 by ATS/ERS, allowing mirror reclassification of the patients examined. This lack of homogeneity could complicate the access to biological therapies. The definition provided by the GINA document, which reflects what suggested by ATS/ERS, could partially overcome the problem.