Davis DA. Combination forceps fuse both safety and efficiency. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32:717-20. 5 Schuckman MM, Bauland CG. Skin hook and forceps as a unified instrument: the Griffin forceps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113:462-3. 6 Lalonde DH. Hook forceps. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26:597-9. 7 Kelly MBH. 'Tusked' forceps for rapid and atraumatic subcuticular closure of the skin. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51:124-5.
Abstract. Computational histomorphometric approaches typically use low-level image features for building machine learning classifiers. However, these approaches usually ignore high-level expert knowledge. A computational model (M_im) combines low-, mid-, and high-level image information to predict the likelihood of cancer in whole slide images. Handcrafted low-and mid-level features are computed from area, color, and spatial nuclei distributions. High-level information is implicitly captured from the recorded navigations of pathologists while exploring whole slide images during diagnostic tasks. This model was validated by predicting the presence of cancer in a set of unseen fields of view. The available database was composed of 24 cases of basal-cell carcinoma, from which 17 served to estimate the model parameters and the remaining 7 comprised the evaluation set. A total of 274 fields of view of size 1024 × 1024 pixels were extracted from the evaluation set. Then 176 patches from this set were used to train a support vector machine classifier to predict the presence of cancer on a patch-by-patch basis while the remaining 98 image patches were used for independent testing, ensuring that the training and test sets do not comprise patches from the same patient. A baseline model (M_ex) estimated the cancer likelihood for each of the image patches. M_ex uses the same visual features as M_im, but its weights are estimated from nuclei manually labeled as cancerous or noncancerous by a pathologist. M_im achieved an accuracy of 74.49% and an F -measure of 80.31%, while M_ex yielded corresponding accuracy and F-measures of 73.47% and 77.97%, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.