No abstract

Modeling large nonlinear elastic deformation of elastomers is an important issue for developing new materials. Particularly, this is very promising for design and performance analysis of dielectric elastomers (DEs). These “smart materials” are capable of responding to an external electric field by displaying significant change in shape and size. In this paper, finite element method (FEM) was used to simulate the mechanical behavior of soft elastomers on uniaxial tension. Experimental data from uniaxial tensile tests were used in order to calibrate hyperelastic constitutive models of the material behavior. The constitutive model parameters were evaluated in ABAQUS/CAE. The 3D-model simulation results of a dumbbell shaped specimen at uniaxial tension shows very good correspondence with experimental data.

No abstract

The additive manufacturing technology has made its debut in the industrial field about 30 years ago, when prototyped parts were usually used at the 3D printing stage during fabrication, to give the end customer a truthful concept of how a part will looks when conventional manufacturing techniques were used for final part fabrication. Because of the increasing demand for non-toxic, biodegradable materials and products, human society is always searching for new materials with specific applications, which are able to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Consequently, it is essential to identify the qualities of these materials and their behavior when subjected to various external factors, in order to find their optimal solutions for application in various domains. Manufacturing parts from biodegradable materials by 3D printing represents a major concern of industry specialists. The 3D printing process involves several parameters whose influence on the sample functional characteristics is a topical issue. In this paper are determined influences of certain technological parameters (thickness of the layer, filling speed, and part orientation on the printing bed) on some mechanical properties (tensile strength, structure, thermal analysis by DSC, and friction coefficient). Experiments were performed on specimens made of three materials: PLA, HD PLA Green, and Impact PLA Gray. A complete factorial experimental plan was used with three input parameters on two levels. Each experiment was repeated three times following the process stability. The obtained mean values of the tensile test were used in the analysis. The analysis was performed with the MiniTab application, which allowed the parameters hierarchy by influencing each mechanical characteristic studied, model development, and optimum values setting.

The aim of this study was to compare Rockwell hardness (HRC) and modulus of elasticity (Young modulus) to different restorative materials. Three commercial composite resins: Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE Co.), Zmack Comp (Zermack SpA, Italy), Kalore (GC Corporation, Japan) and one compomer: Dyract eXtra (Dentsply De Trey Gmbh, Germany) were used. Six samples of each material were obtained by placing them in plastic rings having 5 mm inner diameter and 6 mm high. All composite samples were cured for 40 s using a lamp LEDidition - Ivoclaire Vivadent clinical, Austria. The samples were finished and polished and then stored in distilled water, at room temperature for 48 hours. Rockwell Hardness (HRC) measurements were realized using the UMT-2 Tribometer (CETR). The hardness was automatically calculated from the slope of unloading curve and expressed in GPa and transformed in HRC values (kgf/mm2). Six indentations were performed on diametral direction and mean values were calculated for all tested samples. The device also measured the modulus of elasticity for each sample. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test (significance level of p [ 0.05). The mean HRC values were the following: Filtek Z250 ] Zmack Comp ] Dyract eXtra ] Kalore (82.98 ] 70.10 ] 53.27 ] 37.72 kg/mm2). Regarding Young modulus, the rank from highest to lowest as follows: FiltekZ250 ] Zmack Comp ] Dyract eXtra ] Kalore (16.24 ] 14.05 ] 12.41 ] 7.86). The microhydrid composite resins have a significantly higher hardness than nano-hybrid composites or compomers.