Modern liberal democracy is inseparable from the conviction that the protection of natural human rights requires law not only as a social institution which regulates relationships of society members, but also as an institution that leads to the peaceful development of these relationships. However lately, the growing tensions among the countries reveal the decline of this conviction. The question is whether liberal democratic societies, the members of which are mostly grown under conditions of freedom and peace, are strong enough to face these threats? This newly developing social situation requires a thorough research of a state of legal consciousness. The majority of members of modern society acquire comprehensive education, which, inter alia forms the framework of legal consciousness of the younger generation and thus enables its representatives to base the social interaction on the respect for the dignity of other human being. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the features of the content of the education of legal consciousness in a comprehensive school.

No abstract

No abstract

The EU lacks the legal ideology as a social instrument that could satisfy the spirit of liberal democracy and would help to consolidate different societies to a solid European demos. Although the existence of an ideological system alone does not guarantee social consensus, it helps to manage dissension within the limits of particular values and norms. It is because a legal ideology provides the structure for social thought that individuals and social groups are able to interpret the nature of emerging conflicts and the interests they 184The article demonstrates that the neoliberal way of thinking that prevails in contemporary Europe does not meet the spirit of the constitutionalism of the EU MemberStates; the article introduces some aspects of Aharon Barak's legal ideology that could be relevant for the formation and development of European demos and constitutionalism. In order to achieve this aim, the research is focused on issues that emerge in the area of three main pillars of constitutionalism: (1) adherence to the rule of law, (2) limited and accountable government, and (3) protection of fundamental human rights.

The latter European crisis reveals the fact that traditional agreements between governments of the Member States and supranational political and legal institutions of the European Union are not sufficient for the maintenance of European Union stability and integrity. Therefore, the political and legal sustainability of the European Union requires a certain metatheory as a methodology, which could essentially contribute to the coherent construction, interpretation and assessment of theoretical and practical issues of the European Union’s legal and political reality. This paper aims to explore two main questions: What is constitutionalism as a legal-political metatheory? What challenges are faced by this theory while addressing the specific EU legal-political reality construction problems? The results of the research reveal that constitutionalism as a metatheory is constituted by principles and values, which provide ideological support for the development of the nation, and performs a methodological function in the construction of legal and political reality. However, the EU’s political elite still seeks to legitimize constitutionalism as a political action theory, which, accordingly, legitimizes the respective legal policies it pursues. This process dangerously increases the gap between the EU’s political elite and the societies of its Member States.