Background: In Sri Lanka filariasis is endemic in Southern, Western and North Western provinces covering eight districts designated as implementation units in the Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (PELF). Despite control activities over sixty years including multidose diethylcarbamazine, 6 mg/kg treatment microfilaria rates had persisted at low levels. Following systematic social mobilisation the first MDA with DEC albendazole combination was conducted in 2002.

Using in-depth interviews, information on the current state of lymphoedema management was collected from 101 cases of lymphatic filariasis with lymphoedema in three suburbs of Matara. The interviews were conducted prior to the introduction of a programme of community home-based care (CHBC) that incorporates modern lymphoedema-management strategies. Thirty-two of the interviewees had severe lymphoedema (of grade III or above). The male interviewees had significantly more entry lesions than the female. Most of the subjects had suffered from episodes of limb pain with fever, although the incidence of these episodes appeared unrelated to the severity of the lymphoedema. The frequency of the episodes of limb-pain/fever in the 12 months prior to the interviews appeared unrelated either to the level of daily hygiene, which was generally poor, or to the frequency of bathing. Many (65%) of the subjects paid no attention to limb care when bathing, and 44% did not use footwear. Over 80% made no effort to keep their afflicted limbs elevated, and 95% did not exercise. Most of the female interviewees felt shameful of their condition and were, in consequence, less likely to attend government clinics, for treatment, than the male interviewees. The drug treatment that the interviewees had received was often inadequate, and most had stopped seeking treatment because they had not perceived any significant treatment-attributable improvement in their condition. Modern lymphoedema-management strategies (based on regular washing, careful drying, and treatment, with antifungal, antibiotic or emollient creams, of the affected limbs, limb elevation, exercise, and use of footwear) had not reached the study communities and the local physicians were not aware of them. When dermatology life-quality indexes (DLQI) were calculated for the interviewees, the 26 most impaired subjects gave scores of 5-15 (mean=8.6). The DLQI for these subjects will be regularly re-evaluated, as a measure of the effectiveness of the CHBC programme that has now begun.

No abstract

No abstract

Aedes polynesiensis and Ae. samoanus biting densities and Wuchereria bancrofti infection and infective rates were studied in 47 villages throughout the islands of Samoa Upolu, Manono and Savaii during 1978-79, and microfilaria (mf) rates were surveyed in 28 of the villages. The mf rate was correlated with both infection and infective rates of Ae. polynesiensis in Upolu, but not of Ae. samoanus. In Upolu, Ae. polynesiensis was apparently the major vector. It was relatively more abundant in more cultivated and populated areas, along the northern coast of Upolu, except Apia town area. In Savaii, Ae. samoanus predominated over Ae. polynesiensis except in "plantation" villages. Relatively high biting densities and rates of infection and infectivity indicated that Ae. samoanus was not less important than Ae. polynesiensis as a vector in Savaii. Ae. samoanus preferred natural vegetation, in contrast to Ae. polynesiensis which was found near human habitations in cultivated land. There was no difference between the biting densities of Ae. polynesiensis in "coastal" and "inland" villages, indicating that crab holes (numerous only in some coastal villages) may not influence the density of Ae. polynesiensis. Higher mf rates were associated with villages where Ae. polynesiensis, rather than Ae. samoanus, was dominant, indicating that Ae. polynesiensis was generally a more efficient vector. In the former villages, the difference in mf rates between males and females was smaller than in the latter, probably reflecting a difference in biting habits of the vectors. Ae. polynesiensis infections were recorded in plantations over 2 km from any village, suggesting that both habitats were foci of transmission.