No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had significant impact on health care worldwide which has led to a reduction in all elective admissions and management of patients through virtual care. The purpose of this study is to assess changes in STEMI volumes, door to reperfusion, and the time from the onset of symptoms until reperfusion therapy, and in-hospital events between the pre-COVID-19 (PC) and after COVID-19 (AC) period. All acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases were retrospectively identified from 16 centers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 period from January 01 to April 30, 2020. These cases were compared to a pre-COVID period from January 01 to April 30, 2018 and 2019. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-five patients with a mean age 56.3 (SD ± 12.4) years, 88.3% were male. During COVID-19 Pandemic the total STEMI volumes was reduced (28%, n = 500), STEMI volumes for those treated with reperfusion therapy was reduced too (27.6%, n = 450). Door to balloon time < 90 minutes was achieved in (73.1%, no = 307) during 2020. Timing from the onset of symptoms to the balloon of more than 12 hours was higher during 2020 comparing to pre-COVID 19 years (17.2% vs <3%, respectively). There were no differences between the AC and PC period with respect to in-hospital events and the length of hospital stay. There was a reduction in the STEMI volumes during 2020. Our data reflected the standard of care for STEMI patients continued during the COVID-19 pandemic while demonstrating patients delayed presenting to the hospital.

Background: Predicting left ventricle (LV) remodeling is important for outcome prediction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Novel echocardiographic techniques may be beneficial for those patients. Objectives:We hypothesized that the semiautomated calculation of baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) can predict LV remodeling and 6-month clinical outcomes in these patients. Methods:During the period from March to December 2018, 130 patients with successful reperfusion of STEMI were prospectively included. Within 48 hours, patients underwent a baseline GLS study with follow-up study at 6 months. Patients were divided into two groups: group I: patients who showed adverse LV remodeling and group II: patients who did not. The endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, readmission due to heart failure, and urgent revascularization. Results:The mean baseline GLS changed from −13.1 ± 3.5% for group I and −16.8 ± 3.1% for group II, to −10.2 ± 4.7% and −12.6 ± 3.1%, respectively, at 6-month follow-up. ROC analysis demonstrated a cutoff value of baseline GLS > −12.5% predicted LV remodeling with 64.5% sensitivity and 89% specificity (AUC 0.797, 95% CI 0.690-0.904). Multivariate logistic regression analysis model using 6-month MACEs occurrence as a dependent factor showed baseline GLS value> −12.5% to be the only significant independent predictor MACEs occurrence (OR 0.704, 95% CI 0.597-0.829, P < .001). Linear regression analysis showed that for every point estimate deterioration of baseline GLS, there was a significant corresponding 2.55 mL increase in LVEDV at 6-month follow-up (CI −4.501 to −0.612, P = .01).Conclusion: GLS measurement can predict remodeling and adverse clinical events in STEMI patients.

Introduction: Timely fibrinolysis for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reduces infarct size and hence preserves LV function and reduces mortality. Optimal regimen of streptokinase (SK) infusion in such patients is a matter of interest. The current study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of accelerated SK infusion regimen in patients with STEMI versus the standard one. Methods: One hundred consecutive STEMI patients were randomly allocated into one of 2 groups: group I (50 patients) who received accelerated SK regimen (1.5 million units over 30 minutes) and group II (50 patients) received standard SK regimen (1.5 million units over 60 minutes). Efficacy was evaluated non-invasively using clinical (chest pain), ECG (resolution of ST segment) and laboratory tests (earlier and higher peaking of cardiac troponin I). Safety was evaluated by assessment of multiple in-hospital adverse events. Results: Both groups were statistically matched in all baseline criteria. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding each parameter of successful reperfusion in favor of accelerated regimen. When all these parameters were combined, 31 patients (62%) had successful reperfusion in group I versus 19 patients (38%) in group II (P = 0.016). We did not report any significant difference between both groups regarding in-hospital mortality, in-hospital heart failure, major bleeding, hypotension or allergic reaction to SK. Mean pre-discharge ejection fraction was higher in group I than group II (50.9 ± 6.6% versus 47.3 ± 4.6%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Accelerated regimen of SK infusion is safe and effective method of reperfusion in patients with STEMI.

No abstract