Background: Thyroid autotransplantation offers an attractive alternative to subtotal thyroidectomy and replacement therapy. However, it has not been sufficiently clinically investigated.
BackgroundThe literature contains diverse and sometimes contradicting results about wound seroma following thyroidectomy. This is probably due to the subjective clinical estimation of seroma, or due to failure to differentiate between the occurrence of subcutaneous (SC) and deep wound collections. This work aimed at objectively investigating the factors affecting subcutaneous and deep wound seroma after thyroidectomy.MethodsThe relation between various operative and clinico-pathological factors and the collection formation was prospectively analyzed in a cohort of 100 patients after conventional thyroidectomy. Wound seroma was assessed clinically and via high-resolution ultrasonography at 24 h, 48 h and two weeks postoperatively. Sonographically detected collections were expressed as SC and/or deep wound collections according to the relation to strap muscles.ResultsOperative duration was the only independent factor significantly affecting the incidence of clinical seroma. Older patients (>40ys) showed significantly larger volumes of early SC collections. Early postoperative pain was significantly related to drain insertion, to the occurrence of clinical seroma and to the volume of SC collections.Sonographically, suction drains and shorter operative durations resulted in significantly less amount of deep collections. Suction drains did not result in less amount of SC collections or in a lower incidence of clinical seroma.ConclusionsOperative duration is the only independent factor significantly related to clinically-detected postoperative seroma with its subsequent postoperative pain. Especially in elderly patients, a flapless technique would be recommended as these patients developed larger volumes of SC collections with subsequent higher pain scores, even if seroma was not clinically detected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.