No abstract

No abstract

Patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells against CD19 (CART19) have displayed anti-leukemia activities. However, data from systemic trials in Chinese patients are limited. T cells transduced with CD19-directed CAR lentiviral vectors were infused in patients with R/R ALL under fludarabine- and cyclophosphamide-based lymphodepletion. The postinfusion responses, toxicities, expansion, and persistence of CART19s in enrolled patients were observed and monitored. We enrolled 15 patients with R/R ALL. The median transduction efficiency of CART19s was 33%. cytotoxicity assays were conducted and showed prominent antileukemia activities with CART19s. The patients received CART19s infusion at doses of 1.1 × 10/kg to 9.8 × 10/kg. Twelve patients achieved complete remission 1 month after CART19s infusion. CART19s expanded and persisted in peripheral blood and bone marrow. At 150 days, the overall survival rate and leukemia-free survival rate were 65.5% and 37.8%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse and the nonrelapse mortality rate were 54.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Four patients underwent subsequent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this trial, 10 patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Grade 3 CRS developed in 40% of patients and was associated with a higher disease burden on day -1 and a higher number of previous relapses. This trial demonstrated potent antileukemia activities of CART19s in Chinese patients with R/R ALL. Disease relapse remained the main obstacle. However, patients with a high risk of relapse after CART19s might benefit from subsequent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. .

The regimen of cytarabine, aclarubicin and G-CSF (CAG) has been widely used in China and Japan for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We searched literature on CAG between 1995 and 2010 and performed a meta-analysis to determine its overall efficacy using a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Thirty five trials with a total of 1029 AML (n = 814) and MDS (n = 215) patients were included for analysis. The CR rate of AML (57.9%) was significantly higher than that of MDS (45.7%) (p < 0.01). No difference in CR was noted between the new (56.7%) and relapsed/refractory AML (60.1%) (p > 0.05). The CR rate was also significantly higher in patients with favorable (64.5%) and intermediate (69.6%) karyotypes than those with unfavorable one (29.5%) (p < 0.05). Remarkably, the CR rate of CAG was significantly higher than those of non-CAG regimens (odds ratio 2.43). CAG regimen was well tolerated, with cardiotoxicity in 2.3% and early death in 5.2% of the cases. In conclusion, CAG regimen was an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of AML, and may be more effective than non-CAG regimens. Randomized controlled trials are strongly recommended to evaluate its efficacy and safety in comparison with the current standard treatment.

Background/Aim: As the knowledgebase of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has grown, classification systems have moved to incorporate these new findings. Methods: We assessed 32,941 patients with AML whose records are contained in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: Half of all patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2013 did not have a World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Acute promyelocytic leukemia and acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis were associated with the longest leukemia-specific survival (110 and 115 months, respectively), and AML with minimal differentiation and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with the shortest (30 and 28 months, respectively). For patients in the WHO groups AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) and AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (AML-RGA), the risk of death was greater for older patients and less for married patients. Black patients with any type of AML-NOS also had a higher risk of death. Patients whose case of AML did not receive a WHO classification were older and this group had a higher risk of death when compared to patients with a WHO type of AML-NOS. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the divergent outcomes of patients with AML and the importance of using the WHO classification system and demographic factors to gauge their prognosis.