Key PointsQuestionIs the recent use of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase?FindingsThis US retrospective cohort study included 163 038 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase. Among patients with use of NOACs within 7 days of hospital arrival vs patients with no use of anticoagulants, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3.7% vs 3.2%, respectively, a difference that was not statistically significant after multivariable adjustment.MeaningRecent use of NOACs was not significantly associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase.

Most individuals who experience aphasia after a stroke recover to some extent, with the majority of gains taking place in the first year. The nature and timecourse of this recovery process is only partially understood, especially its dependence on lesion location and extent, which are the most important determinants of outcome. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of patterns of recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. We recruited 334 patients with acute left hemisphere supratentorial ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and evaluated their speech and language function within 5 days using the Quick Aphasia Battery. At this initial timepoint, 218 patients presented with aphasia. Individuals with aphasia were followed longitudinally, with follow-up evaluations of speech and language at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year post stroke, wherever possible. Lesions were manually delineated based on acute clinical MRI or CT imaging. Patients with and without aphasia were divided into 13 groups of individuals with similar, commonly occurring patterns of brain damage. Trajectories of recovery were then investigated as a function of group (i.e., lesion location and extent) and speech/language domain (overall language function, word comprehension, sentence comprehension, word finding, grammatical construction, phonological encoding, speech motor programming, speech motor execution, and reading). We found that aphasia is dynamic, multidimensional, and gradated, with little explanatory role for aphasia subtypes or binary concepts such as fluency. Patients with circumscribed frontal lesions recovered well, consistent with some previous observations. More surprisingly, most patients with larger frontal lesions extending into the parietal or temporal lobes also recovered well, as did patients with relatively circumscribed temporal, temporoparietal, or parietal lesions. Persistent moderate or severe deficits were common only in patients with extensive damage throughout the middle cerebral artery distribution, or extensive temporoparietal damage. There were striking differences between speech/language domains in their rates of recovery and their relationships to overall language function, suggesting that specific domains differ in the extent to which they are redundantly represented throughout the language network, as opposed to depending on specialized cortical substrates. Our findings have an immediate clinical application in that they will enable clinicians to estimate the likely course of recovery for individual patients, as well as the uncertainty of these predictions, based on acutely observable neurological factors.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior systematic reviews have compared the efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke, assigning their relative complications as a secondary objective. The objective of the present study is to determine whether the risk of treatment complications differs between patients treated with either agent. METHODS: We performed a systematic review including interventional studies and prospective and retrospective, observational studies enrolling adult patients treated with intravenous tenecteplase for ischemic stroke (both comparative and noncomparative with alteplase). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the www.ClinicalTrials.gov registry from inception through June 3, 2022. The primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage, angioedema, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, other extracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. We performed random effects meta-analyses where appropriate. Evidence was synthesized as relative risks, comparing risks in patients exposed to tenecteplase versus alteplase and absolute risks in patients treated with tenecteplase. RESULTS: Of 2226 records identified, 25 full-text articles (reporting 26 studies of 7913 patients) were included. Sixteen studies included alteplase as a comparator, and 10 were noncomparative. The relative risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with tenecteplase compared with alteplase in the 16 comparative studies was 0.89 ([95% CI, 0.65–1.23]; I 2 =0%). Among patients treated with low dose (<0.2 mg/kg; 4 studies), medium dose (0.2–0.39 mg/kg; 13 studies), and high dose (≥0.4 mg/kg; 3 studies) tenecteplase, the RRs of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were 0.78 ([95% CI, 0.22–2.82]; I 2 =0%), 0.77 ([95% CI, 0.53–1.14]; I 2 =0%), and 2.31 ([95% CI, 0.69–7.75]; I 2 =40%), respectively. The pooled risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in tenecteplase-treated patients, including comparative and noncomparative studies, was 0.99% ([95% CI, 0%–3.49%]; I 2 =0%, 7 studies), 1.69% ([95% CI, 1.14%–2.32%]; I 2 =1%, 23 studies), and 4.19% ([95% CI, 1.92%–7.11%]; I 2 =52%, 5 studies) within the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups. The risks of any intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and other studied outcomes were comparable between the 2 agents. CONCLUSIONS: Across medium- and low-dose tiers, the risks of complications were generally comparable between those treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.

Introduction: Prior systematic reviews have focused on a comparison of efficacy endpoints between tenecteplase (TNK) and alteplase. The objectives of this study are to determine whether the rate of treatment complications differs between patients treated with the two agents. Methods: This systematic review (CRD42022303835) was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We included prospective, interventional studies and prospective and retrospective observational studies. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry from inception through June 3 rd 2022. The primary endpoint was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and secondary endpoints included any ICH, mortality, angioedema, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and other extracranial hemorrhage. We performed separate random effects meta analyses for each endpoint. Evidence was synthesized as relative risks, comparing subjects exposed to TNK versus alteplase as well as absolute risks in those treated with TNK. Results: Of 2,226 records identified, 26 were eligible for inclusion including 7,921 patients. Seventeen studies included alteplase as a comparator group and 10 were non-comparative. The relative risk of sICH in patients treated with TNK compared with alteplase was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68-1.28). Across those treated with low, medium and high doses of TNK, the relative risks were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.22-2.82), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.58-1.20) and 2.31 (0.69-7.75) respectively. The unadjusted rate of sICH, including comparative and non-comparative studies, was 1%, 2% and 4% within the low, medium and high dose groups. Discussion: To-date, this is the most comprehensive systematic review examining relative complications of TNK and alteplase. The rate of treatment harms is broadly comparable between those treated with the two agents. We present evidence that the rate of sICH may be increased in those treated with higher doses of TNK.