MWA may be a feasible, effective and simple strategy for the emergent control of intraoperative hepatic tumour bleeding. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first reported cases of this novel application of MWA.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of precoagulation with microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection. Methods: A total of 66 eligible patients were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive either the traditional clamp-crushing method (Control group) or the MWA precoagulation method (MWA group) for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection. The operative time, hepatic portal occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, postoperative complications and recovery outcomes were compared. Results: Compared to the Control group, the MWA group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss. Fewer red blood cell transfusions were observed in the MWA group but without statistical significance. The MWA group showed significantly higher serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels at day 1 postoperatively, but no differences between the MWA and Control groups were found at days 3 and 7. There were no significant differences in terms of operative time, hepatic portal occlusion time, postoperative total bilirubin levels, human albumin solution consumption or length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications such as impaired renal function, pyrexia, admission to ICU, abscess, biliary leakage, intrahepatic and distant tumor recurrence and in-hospital mortality were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Precoagulation with MWA reduced intraoperative blood loss with similar postoperative complications, providing a safe, effective, novel alternative for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection. Additional results from larger series are recommended to confirm these findings.

Background Minimally invasive modifications of inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL), including laparoscopic IL (LIL) and robotic-assisted IL (RAIL), have been utilized for penile cancer. Comparative study is necessary to guide the decision about which minimally invasive technique to select for IL. Therefore we compared RAIL with LIL performed via an antegrade approach in terms of perioperative outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 43 patients who underwent RAIL (n = 20) or LIL (n = 23) for penile cancer from 2016 to 2020. The key surgical procedures and techniques are described. Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, and operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph nodal yield, nodal positivity, postoperative drain duration, and disease recurrence during follow-up were assessed. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared whereas continuous variables were compared by t-tests. Results The operative time for RAIL was significantly shorter than that of LIL (median 83 vs 95 min). Significantly less blood loss was reported with RAIL than with LIL (median 10 vs 35 ml). Lymph node yield, pathological positive nodes, the hospital stay, postoperative drain duration, postoperative complications and recurrence were similar for RAIL and LIL. Conclusions For patients with penile cancer, perioperative outcomes of RAIL and LIL were similar, but there was less blood loss, a shorter operative time for robotic cases.