MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (typically consisting of 18–25 nucleotides) that negatively control expression of target genes at the post-transcriptional level. Owing to the biological significance of miRNAs, miRTarBase was developed to provide comprehensive information on experimentally validated miRNA–target interactions (MTIs). To date, the database has accumulated >13,404 validated MTIs from 11,021 articles from manual curations. In this update, a text-mining system was incorporated to enhance the recognition of MTI-related articles by adopting a scoring system. In addition, a variety of biological databases were integrated to provide information on the regulatory network of miRNAs and its expression in blood. Not only targets of miRNAs but also regulators of miRNAs are provided to users for investigating the up- and downstream regulations of miRNAs. Moreover, the number of MTIs with high-throughput experimental evidence increased remarkably (validated by CLIP-seq technology). In conclusion, these improvements promote the miRTarBase as one of the most comprehensively annotated and experimentally validated miRNA–target interaction databases. The updated version of miRTarBase is now available at http://miRTarBase.cuhk.edu.cn/.

BackgroundA major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging.ResultsWe conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2.ConclusionsThe top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1037-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In this study, we present a fully automated tool, called IDEAL-Q, for label-free quantitation analysis. It accepts raw data in the standard mzXML format as well as search results from major search engines, including Mascot, SEQUEST, and X!Tandem, as input data. To quantify as many identified peptides as possible, IDEAL-Q uses an efficient algorithm to predict the elution time of a peptide unidentified in a specific LC-MS/MS run but identified in other runs. Then, the predicted elution time is used to detect peak clusters of the assigned peptide. Detected peptide peaks are processed by statistical and computational methods and further validated by signal-to-noise ratio, charge state, and isotopic distribution criteria (SCI validation) to filter out noisy data. The performance of IDEAL-Q has been evaluated by several experiments. First, a serially diluted protein mixed with Escherichia coli lysate showed a high correlation with expected ratios and demonstrated good linearity (R2 = 0.996). Second, in a biological replicate experiment on the THP-1 cell lysate, IDEAL-Q quantified 87% (1,672 peptides) of all identified peptides, surpassing the 45.7% (909 peptides) achieved by the conventional identity-based approach, which only quantifies peptides identified in all LC-MS/MS runs. Manual validation on all 11,940 peptide ions in six replicate LC-MS/MS runs revealed that 97.8% of the peptide ions were correctly aligned, and 93.3% were correctly validated by SCI. Thus, the mean of the protein ratio, 1.00 ± 0.05, demonstrates the high accuracy of IDEAL-Q without human intervention. Finally, IDEAL-Q was applied again to the biological replicate experiment but with an additional SDS-PAGE step to show its compatibility for label-free experiments with fractionation. For flexible workflow design, IDEAL-Q supports different fractionation strategies and various normalization schemes, including multiple spiked internal standards. User-friendly interfaces are provided to facilitate convenient inspection, validation, and modification of quantitation results. In summary, IDEAL-Q is an efficient, user-friendly, and robust quantitation tool. It is available for download.

No abstract

No abstract