Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a severe fibrotic skin disease. It has always been a major problem in clinical treatment, mainly because its pathogenesis has not been well understood. The roles of bacterial contamination and prolonged wound inflammation were considered significant. IL‐10 is a potent anti‐inflammatory cytokine and plays a pivotal role in wound healing and scar formation. Here, we investigate whether IL‐10 alleviates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced inflammatory response and skin scarring and explore the possible mechanism of scar formation. Our results showed that the expression of TLR4 and pp65 was higher in HS and HS‐derived fibroblasts (HSFs) than their counterpart normal skin (NS) and NS‐derived fibroblasts (NSFs). LPS could up‐regulate the expression of TLR4, pp65, Col I, Col III and α‐SMA in NSFs, but IL‐10 could down‐regulate their expression in both HSFs and LPS‐induced NSFs. Blocking IL‐10 receptor (IL‐10R) or the phosphorylation of STAT3, their expression was up‐regulated. In addition, in vitro and in vivo models results showed that IL‐10 could alleviate LPS‐induced fibroblast‐populated collagen lattice (FPCL) contraction and scar formation. Therefore, IL‐10 alleviates LPS‐induced skin scarring via IL‐10R/STAT3 axis regulating TLR4/NF‐κB pathway in dermal fibroblasts by reducing ECM proteins deposition and the conversion of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Our results indicate that IL‐10 can alleviate the LPS‐induced harmful effect on wound healing, reduce scar contracture, scar formation and skin fibrosis. Therefore, the down‐regulation of inflammation may lead to a suitable scar outcome and be a better option for improving scar quality.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has broadly been applied to treat colorectal cancer as one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents. However, it frequently causes intestinal mucosal injury and related side effects, such as abdominal pain and diarrhoea, which limit the use of 5-FU in a clinic setting. Polaprezinc has gradually become known as a mucosal protective agent for the management of gastric ulcer. This study aimed to investigate the prophylactic efficacy of Polaprezinc administered orally against intestinal mucositis induced by 5-FU in mice on the condition that the antitumour effect could not be compromised. We induced intestinal mucositis in SPF-grade ICR mice with 5-FU, and evaluated intestinal damage in the absence or presence of Polaprezinc. We examined the score of diarrhoea and the loss of weight after the 5-FU treatment and assessed the integrity of villus and the proliferation of small intestine crypt cells by haematoxylin and eosin staining and PCNA immunohistochemical detection. The antitumour effect of 5-FU on colorectal cancer was assessed with or without Polaprezinc in a xenograft model. The result showed that Polaprezinc significantly reduced the elevated diarrhoea score and the body-weight loss caused by 5-FU abolished histological abnormality and crypt cell hypoproliferation in a dose-dependent manner, without affecting 5-FU efficacy on colon xenograft tumour in mice. We conclude that Polaprezinc could inhibit 5-FU-induced diarrhoea and alleviate the weight loss during 5-FU chemotherapy, as a possible candidate for treatment and prevention of intestinal mucositis, through protecting intestinal mucosa and improving the quality of life after chemotherapy.

/kg). After the animals were sacrificed, blood was collected and the serum levels of NF-κB and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured. Changes in histology were observed by light microscopy. The protein levels of AKT, phosphorylated AKT and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) were determined by western blot analysis. The results suggested that PZ reduced the DSS-induced increase in the inflammatory proteins TNF-α and NF-κB in the UC model. The high-dose of PZ also increased the HSP70 protein level, inhibited AKT phosphorylation in a DSS-induced UC animal model, and decreased white blood cell and neutrophil % counts compared to levels in an untreated DSS control group. Histopathology indicated that the mice of the DSS model group had irregular colonic villi, a large number of inflammatory cells and mucosal damage, whereas mice of the group treated with PZ had small intestinal villus morphology and their villi showed signs of recovery from the damage of UC. The results of the present study indicated that PZ significantly alleviates DSS-induced UC in mice, relieves diarrhea, and inhibits the phosphorylation of inflammatory factors and the inflammatory AKT signaling pathway.

Background and Purpose: Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a serious fibrotic skin disease. The roles of bacterial contamination and prolonged inflammation in wound were considered to be significant. IL-10 plays a pivotal role in wound healing and scar formation. Here, we investigate whether IL-10 alleviates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response and skin scarring, explore the possible mechanism in scar formation. Experimental Approach: RT-qPCR, Western blotting, histochemistry, immunostaining, ELISA array, electron microscope, fibroblast-populated collagen lattice (FPCL) and a rabbit ear scar model were used to investigate and validate the effect of IL-10 on LPS-stimulated scar formation. Key Results: Our results showed that the expression of TLR4 and pp65 was higher in HS and HS-derived fibroblasts (HSFs) than their counterpart normal skin (NS)

Background: Quadruple therapy with polaprezinc provided an alternative to Helicobacter pylori eradication; however, the effect on gut microbiota remains uncertain. This study aims to identify whether polaprezinc-containing quadruple therapy causes adverse microbiota effects among asymptomatic adults, compared with bismuth therapy. Methods: This was a randomized control trial. One hundred asymptomatic H. pylori-infected adults were randomly (1:1) assigned to two treatment groups (polaprezinc-containing therapy, PQT; or bismuth-containing therapy, BQT). Fecal samples were collected from subjects before and 4–8 weeks after therapy. Samples were sequenced for the V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Results: The relative abundance of the three dominant bacterial phyla (Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria) accounted for more than 95% of each treatment group. The alpha diversity between eradications that succeeded and those that failed had no significant difference (p > 0.05). After successful eradication, the alpha diversity in the BQT group decreased in comparison with the baseline (p < 0.05). Subjects who were successfully eradicated by BQT showed considerably lower alpha diversity indices than those of the PQT at follow-up (p < 0.05). The abundance of Parasutterella in subjects who were successfully eradicated by PQT was four times greater than that of BQT (q < 0.05). Conclusion: A 14-day PQT may be superior to BQT in maintaining short-term gut microbiota homeostasis after H. pylori treatment. Our findings preliminarily provide evidence of the short-term impacts of the gut microbiota after PQT treatment of H. pylori infection.