No abstract

This essay contributes to the ongoing contemporary debate about the eighteenth century ideology of “Republican Motherhood,” a feminine ideal that gave new status to women as mothers but limited their participation as citizens. It examines critical distinctions between Rousseau and Wollstone‐craft concerning women's place within the republic and their role as mothers within the family. At issue is whether the ideology of republican motherhood represented a compromise or a misstep on women's journey to full democratic citizenship. Wollstonecraft's emancipatory politics makes her association with the republican motherhood thesis problematic because as a feminist she rejected the separation of spheres that was the foundation of this gender ideology. She argued that women must have their own political identity and represent their interests in government. Her feminist political theory can be read as promoting a notion of “enlightened maternity” aimed at reconciling the natural rights of woman as citizen with her role as a nurturer within the family. Wollstonecraft concluded that the reciprocal nature of rights and duties demanded both men and women exercise the rights of citizenship and the duties of parents in order for the republic to be virtuous.

IntroductionFor over a decade, the Southern Political Science Association has been committed to assessing the status of women faculty members by regularly administering surveys to political science programs within the South. These surveys, sponsored by the SPSA and administered by the Committee on the Status of Women, have resulted in numerous recommendations for creating diversity within departments and gender equity within programs. In this article we examine the results of the Millennium Survey, the latest effort to evaluate the progress of female political scientists within the South. Our findings suggest that in the last 10 years women faculty have made great progress, especially in Ph.D. granting institutions where the number of women in tenured positions at the rank of associate and full professor has doubled since the last survey. This is an important shift from a trend noted in an earlier CSW survey and in a national report in the September–October 1998 issue of Academe where the author remarked that “Women, unlike men, traded off rank for institutional prestige. For women, the more prestigious their institution, the lower their rank; for men there was no such relationship” (Valian 1998). Contrary to the national trend dynamic, women in the South are making the most progress at the most prestigious institutions. Perhaps there are a greater number of faculty positions within doctoral departments and that in the last 10 years these programs have had more opportunities to hire and promote women. Our survey suggests that there have been fewer tenure-track positions available for women within departments at smaller, bachelor's degree-granting institutions. While the number of female associate professors has increased within baccalaureate-granting programs, the number of female full professors has actually declined. However, the overall number of women faculty members at all ranks has increased in the majority of political science programs within the South.

No abstract

No abstract