Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive salivary gland malignancy, which often presents at an advanced stage. A proportion of SDC are characterized by HER2 amplification and/or overexpression of androgen receptor (AR), which could be targeted in a subset of patients, but the presence of AR splice variant‐7 (AR‐V7) in some SDC cases could result in resistance to anti‐androgen therapy. We evaluated a cohort of 28 cases of SDC for potentially targetable biomarkers and pathways using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next‐generation sequencing (DNA and RNA) assays. Pathogenic genetic aberrations were found in all but 1 case and affected TP53 (n = 19), HRAS (n = 7), PIK3CA, ERBB2 (HER2), and NF1 (n = 5 each); KMT2C (MLL3) and PTEN (n = 3 each); BRAF (p.V600E), KDM5C and NOTCH1 (n = 2 each). Androgen receptor was expressed in all cases and 13 of 27 harbored the AR‐V7 splice variant (including a case without any other detectable genetic alteration). HER2 IHC was expressed in 11 of 28 cases. The majority of SDC cases had no biomarkers predictive of immunotherapy response: 5 cases exhibited low (1%‐8%) programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression in tumor cells, 2 cases exhibited elevated TMB, and no samples exhibited microsatellite instability. Notably, the pre‐treatment biopsies from 2 patients with metastatic disease, who demonstrated clinical responses to anti‐androgen therapy, showed AR expression and no AR splice variants. We conclude that comprehensive molecular profiling of SDCs can guide the selection of patients for targeted therapies involving AR, HER2, PD‐L1, mitogen‐activated protein kinase, and PIK3CA pathways.

Background Primary Extra‐mammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a very rare cutaneous adenocarcinoma affecting anogenital or axillary regions. It is characterized by a prolonged course with recurrences and eventually distant metastatic spread for which no specific therapy is known. Methods Eighteen EMPD (13 vulvar and five scrotal) and ten mammary Paget's disease (MPD) cases were comprehensively profiled for gene mutations, fusions and copy number alterations, and for therapy‐relevant protein biomarkers). Results Mutations in TP53 and PIK3CA were the most frequent in both cohorts: 7/15 and 5/15 in EMPD; 1/6 and 4/7 in MPD HER2 gene amplification was detected in 4/18 EMPD (3 vulvar and 1 scrotal case) in contrast to MPD where it was detected in the majority (7/8) of cases. TOP2A gene amplification was seen in 2/12 EMPD and 1/6 MPD, respectively. Similarly, no difference in estrogen receptor expression was seen between the EMPD (4/15) and MPD (3/10). Androgen receptor was also expressed in the majority of both cohorts (12/16 EMPD) and (7/8 MPD).Here ARv7 splice variant was detected in 1/7 EMPD and 1/4 MPD cases, respectively. PD‐L1 expression on immune cells was exclusively observed in three vulvar EMPD. In contrast to MPD, six EMPDs harbored a “high” tumor mutation burden (≥10 mutations/Mb). All tested cases from both cohorts were MSI stable. Conclusions EMPD shares some targetable biomarkers with its mammary counterpart (steroid receptors, PIK3CA signaling pathways, TOP2A amplification). HER2 positivity is notably lower in EMPD while biomarkers to immune checkpoint inhibitors (high TMB and PD‐L1) were observed in some EMPD. Given that no consistent molecular alteration characterizes EMPD, comprehensive theranostic profiling is required to identify individual patients with targetable molecular alterations.

No abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction: Breast metastases from non-mammary carcinomas are very rare and the molecular characteristics of these metastases have not been studied. Due to the uniqueness of this type of metastases, we evaluated whether there was any molecular or immunologic similarities among the patients with metastases to the breast. Patients and Methods: Fifty-one patients with metastatic carcinomas to the breast (49 female and 2 male) were identified in the files of Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Average age at presentation was 57 years (range, 20-90 years). Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 was performed using SP142 (Ventana) or 22c3 (DAKO) antibodies; 592 genes sequencing (n=47), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) (n=6) and total mutational burden (TMB) (n=14) were obtained from a next generation sequencing platform (Illumina). Results: Three most common primary sites were lung (19, 37%), ovary (15, 29%) and fallopian tubes/peritoneum (7, 14%). Ten metastases (20%) demonstrated neuroendocrine differentiation. When 1% cutoff was applied, tumor cells PD-L1 expression was detected in 10 cases (20%), and immune cells expression of PD-L1 in 19 patients (37%). Three cases (6%) had PD-L1 staining in both cancer and infiltrating immune cells. 50% of the cases exhibited mutations in TP53 gene, while other mutated genes followed the pathways typically seen in their primary sites (e.g. VHL in renal carcinomas, BRCA1 in fallopian tube carcinoma). Total mutational burden was high (≥10 mutations/Mb) in five out of 14 successfully analyzed cases (36%) and no case (0%) exhibited high microsatellite instability. Interestingly, estrogen receptor status was positive in 13/49 patients (26.5%) including 12 adenocarcinomas originating from ovary, Fallopian tube or peritoneum and one duodenal neuroendocrine. No tumor was HER2 positive. Conclusions: Metastases to the breast proved to be heterogeneous but there were molecular, endocrine and immunologic findings that yielded information that could be used to make therapeutic decisions which including the use of new immunotherapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Gatalica Z, Senarathne W, Vranic S, Pockaj BA. Profiling of metastatic carcinomas to the breast for the biomarkers of immuno-oncology therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-27.