1. The management of chronic pain should be directed by the underlying cause of the pain. Whatever the cause, the primary goal of patient care should be symptom control. 2. Opioid treatment should be considered for both continuous neuropathic and nociceptive pain if other reasonable therapies fail to provide adequate analgesia within a reasonable timeframe. 3. The aim of opioid treatment is to relieve pain and improve the patient's quality of life. Both of these should be assessed during a trial period. 4. The prescribing physician should be familiar with the patient's psychosocial status. 5. The use of sustained-release opioids administered at regular intervals is recommended. 6. Treatment should be monitored. 7. A contract setting out the patient's rights and responsibilities may help to emphasize the importance of patient involvement. 8. Opioid treatment should not be considered a lifelong treatment.

Stimulation of primary afferent neurons offers a new approach for the control of localized chronic pain. We describe the results with a new neurostimulation technique, subcutaneous target stimulation (STS), for the treatment of chronic focal noncancer pain. STS applies permanent electrical stimulation directly at the painful area via a percutaneous-placed subcutaneous lead. We reported the clinical outcomes of 111 patients with focal chronic, noncancer pain treated with STS in this first nationwide, multicenter retrospective analysis. The indications for STS were low back pain (n = 29) and failed back surgery syndrome (back pain with leg pain) (n = 37), cervical neck pain (n = 15), and postherpetic neuralgia (n = 12). Pain intensity was measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS) before and after implantation. Data on analgesic medication, stimulation systems, position, and type of leads and complications were obtained from the patients' records. After implantation, the mean pain intensity improved by more than 50% (mean NRS reduction from 8.2 to 4.0) in the entire patient group (P = 0.0009). This was accompanied by a sustained reduction in demand for analgesics. In all the patients, the STS leads were positioned directly at the site of maximum pain. Lead dislocation occurred in 14 patients (13%), infections in 7 (6%), and in 6 cases (5%), lead fractures were observed. The retrospective data analysis revealed that STS effectively provided pain relief in patients suffering from refractory focal chronic noncancer pain and that STS is an alternative treatment option. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm these retrospective findings. This article presents a new minimally invasive technique for therapy-resistant focal pain.

No abstract

ONL with periradicular steroid therapy might exert a functional and sustained analgesic effect in patients with degenerative changes in the lumbar spine not responding to conservative therapy and was most effective below 50 years with disc herniation in one segment.

The administration of AT III was safe and well tolerated. The overall 28-day all-cause mortality was 30% (43% intermittent bolus infusions; 21% continuous infusion). The mean probability of dying according to the SAPS II was 48%. The difference in mortality between both groups was within the range of chance. AT III plasma levels were elevated from low baseline levels to above 120% soon after onset of AT III therapy and remained at these levels for the treatment phase of 4 days. Functional and immunologic levels of AT III corresponded very well. With an overall median volume of distribution of 4.5 l (range: 2.4-6.5 l), AT III only moderately extended beyond plasma. The overall median elimination half-life was 18.6 h (range: 5.1-37.4). Overall, median response was 1.75% per IU/kg (range: 1.14-2.8). The variability of elimination parameters was quite noteworthy (CV = 41-59%), whereas distribution-related parameters showed a moderate variability (CV = 24%). In spite of this variability, both high-dose IV regimens reliably provided AT III levels above 120% for all but one patient. An increased mortality was observed for patients with a distribution volume exceeding 4.5 l (or a response < 1.7% per IU/kg). AT III distribution volumes above 4.5 l might indicate a capillary leak phenomenon. The continuous infusion regimen was slightly preferred by the investigators with regard to practicability.