No abstract

Summary Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data from the British Isles are reviewed and are found to be consistent with erratic polar shift from the vicinity of 10° N, 180° E in the Ordovician to 0°, 145° E in the Siluro‐Devonian and to 25° N, 160° E in the early Carboniferous. The Cambrian pole is less well established near 25° N, 170° E. The rates and times of shifts are discussed. World‐wide palaeomagnetic data suggest the existence of three groups of continents in the Early and Middle Palaeozoic—the Gondwanan, Euramerican and Siberian groups—separated by large oceans which closed in the Late Palaeozoic along the lines of the Hercynides and Uralides. The data from Gondwana and Siberia are internally consistent and each may have been a single plate to which only peripheral slices were added subsequently. Data from Euramerica are less coherent. The most probable explanation seems to be that this group of continents was loosely‐knit and consisted of the North American and the Baltic/Russian plates (which joined in the Silurian on the site of the Scandinavian Caledonides) and the British Isles sub‐plate which joined in the Devonian (on previously unrecognized sutures lying in the present North Atlantic and North Sea respectively). This interpretation takes all the data at face value and assumes that time‐coverage is adequate in all parts of the region. Alternatively, if time‐coverage was not adequate, Britain might have been part of the North American plate, but further work is required to discriminate between these interpretations. Palaeomagnetic evidence from the British Isles also indicates that little or no closure has taken place across the British Caledonides since Early Ordovician time. If so the British Isles sub‐plate may have been rotated in azimuth as well as being transported laterally before joining the Euramerican plate. Examples of rotation and remagnetization on a more local scale are cited, and are ascribed to tectonic and thermal effects of orogeny respectively. The Euramerica and Gondwana groups were already close together by early Carboniferous times, which is distinctly earlier than the Hercynian‐Alleghenian orogenic belt which may mark their juncture. It may be generally true that large scale crustal drift, involving consumption of a large area of oceanic crust between two continents, significantly predates the orogenic belt which forms when the two continents have met. If this is so, large scale closure across the British Caledonides might have occurred in Precambrian or Cambrian time, but palaeomagnetic data are not yet adequate to evaluate this.

No abstract

Abstract-The Bosumtwi impact structure (Ghana) is a young and well-preserved structure where a vast amount of information is available to constrain any geophysical model. Previous analysis of the airborne magnetic data and results of numerical simulation of impact predicted a strongly magnetic impact-melt body underneath the lake. Recent drilling through the structure did not penetrate such an expected impact-melt rock magnetic source. A new 3-D magnetic model for the structure was constructed based on a newly acquired higher-resolution marine magnetic data set, with consideration of the observed gravity data on the lake, previous seismic models, and the magnetic properties and lithology identified in the two International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) deep boreholes. The new model contains highly magnetic bodies located in the northeast sector of the structure, not centered onto the drilling sites. As in previous models, higher magnetization than that measured in outcropping impactites had to be assigned to the unexposed source bodies. Integration of the new model with the borehole petrophysics and published geology indicates that these bodies likely correspond to an extension to the south of the Kumasi batholith, which outcrops to the northeast of the structure. The possibility that these source bodies are related to the seismically identified central uplift or to an unmapped impact-melt sheet predicted by previous models of the structure is not supported. Detailed magnetic scanning of the Kumasi batholith to the north, and the Bansu intrusion to the south, would provide a test for this interpretation.