Pharmacy education in China focuses on pharmaceutical sciences, with the bachelor of science (BS) of pharmacy as the entry-level degree. Pharmacy practice curricula in these programs are centered on compounding, dispensing, pharmacy administration, and laboratory experiences, which are the traditional responsibilities for pharmacists. Additional graduate-level training is available at the master of science (MS) and the doctor of philosophy (PhD) levels, most of which concentrate on drug discovery and drug development research. Presently, the emphasis in practice is beginning to shift to clinical pharmacy. With this change, additional degree offerings are being developed to meet the growing demand for clinical pharmacists. There is also interest in developing more clinical skills in practicing pharmacists through additional non-degree training. The Ministry of Education is considering a proposal for an entry-level professional degree of master and/or doctor in clinical pharmacy similar to the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) degree in the United States.
Annual faculty evaluations generally include evaluations of teaching, research and service. The research component is relatively simple to evaluate because the evidence of quality is easy to identify--grant dollars generated and their sources as well as numbers of publications and journal quality. Evaluating teaching activities, however, is another matter. Although teaching portfolios and student evaluations are useful tools, most faculty and administrators agree that good processes and comparative measures for evaluating teaching are difficult to find. To complicate the matter further, what constitutes good teaching is usually implied and not defined. A good definition of quality in teaching would be helpful, especially to assist new faculty in setting and working toward their teaching goals.Ideally, any activity should be evaluated by determining the outcomes that the activity produces. For teaching, the desired outcome is student learning. This might be quantified by student performance on each section of standardized tests in comparison to their national peers, the number of essential practice skills that students have developed and how well prepared the students are for subsequent coursework and/or practice. Such a group of tests or skill measures does not exist, and with many team taught courses, employing these tools for individual faculty evaluations would be impossible.An approach that is often utilized in other fields, employing "best practices," may be helpful. The underlying principle is that good outcomes are more likely to result if generally recognized good practices are employed. If we value good outcomes, we should then value the best practices that are most likely to achieve the desired result. Applying this concept to our teaching efforts, employing best practices in education will more likely result in better learning.Faculty should attempt to identify and agree upon best practices for teaching, i.e. those that they consider most valuable. The factors to be considered in developing a best practices list should take into account that students are humans, and as such, human characteristics and interactions between the faculty and students need to be considered. The nature of the interaction between teacher and student contributes greatly to interest in learning or to creating barriers to learning. A best practices lists should also recognize that faculty have educational responsibilities beyond presenting appropriate, contemporary material and testing on it. These responsibilities include serving as a role model of professionalism for students by helping students adopt the behaviors expected of a health care professional and by modeling those behaviors in the classroom. The evaluation process should attempt to gauge the extent to which the agreed upon best practices are being employed.Characteristics, behaviors, and effective techniques that good teachers have in common and that are expected by our accrediting agency have appeared in several publications.1,2,3,4 A compilation of some of these, ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.