Natalizumab added to interferon beta-1a was significantly more effective than interferon beta-1a alone in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Additional research is needed to elucidate the benefits and risks of this combination treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00030966.).

Overview. Clinical types of MS.MS is a chronic recurrent inflammatory disorder of the CNS. The disease results in injury to the myelin sheaths, the oligodendrocytes, and, to a lesser extent, the axons and nerve cells themselves. [1][2][3][4][5] The symptoms of MS vary, depending in part on the location of plaques within the CNS. Common symptoms include sensory disturbances in the limbs, optic nerve dysfunction, pyramidal tract dysfunction, bladder or bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, ataxia, and diplopia. 5Four different clinical courses of MS have been defined. 6 The first, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), is characterized by self-limited attacks of neurologic dysfunction. These attacks develop acutely, evolving over days to weeks. Over the next several weeks to months, most patients experience a recovery of function that is often (but not always) complete. Between attacks the patient is neurologically and symptomatically stable. The second clinical course, secondary progressive MS (SPMS), begins as RRMS, but at some point the attack rate is reduced and the course becomes characterized by a steady deterioration in function unrelated to acute attacks. The third clinical type, primary progressive MS (PPMS), is characterized by a steady decline in function from the beginning without acute attacks. The fourth type, progressive-relapsing MS (PRMS), also begins with a progressive course although these patients also experience occasional attacks. Outcome measures in MS clinical trials.Evaluation of the relative effectiveness of different therapies requires consideration of which outcome measure or measures are relevant to the goals of therapy. Clearly, the most important therapeutic aim of any disease-modifying treatment of MS is to prevent or postpone long-term disability. However, long-term disability in MS often evolves slowly over many years.1-3 Clinical trials, by contrast, study patients for only short periods of time (2 or 3 years) and, therefore, use only short-term outcome measures to assess efficacy. As a result, it is important to validate any short-term measure by its correlation with the actual patient outcome many years later. For a discussion of these issues, interested readers should consult the full-length assessment on the Neurology Web site at www.neurology.org.Scope of this guideline. The purpose of this assessment is to consider the clinical utility of these disease-modifying agents including the anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and immunosuppressive treatments that are currently available.

Objective: To determine whether glatiramer acetate (GA) slows accumulation of disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Methods: A total of 943 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomized to GA or placebo (PBO) in this 3-year, double-blind trial. The primary end point was an intention-to-treat analysis of time to 1-(entry expanded disability status scale, 3.0 -5.0) or 0.5-point expanded disability status scale change (entry expanded disability status scale, 5.5-6.5) sustained for 3 months. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis by an independent data safety monitoring board indicated no discernible treatment effect on the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analyses of disability and magnetic resonance imaging end points were performed. Results: There was a nonsignificant delay in time to sustained accumulated disability in GA-versus PBO-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.07]; p ϭ 0.1753), with significant decreases in enhancing lesions in year 1 and smaller increases in T2 lesion volumes in years 2 and 3 versus PBO. Post hoc analysis showed that survival curves for GA-treated male patients diverged early from PBO-treated male subjects (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95]; p ϭ 0.0193). Interpretation:The trial failed to demonstrate a treatment effect of GA on primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Both the unanticipated low event rate and premature discontinuation of study medication decreased the power to detect a treatment effect. Post hoc analysis suggests GA may have slowed clinical progression in male patients who showed more rapid progression when untreated.

The incidence of persistent antibody positivity associated with natalizumab is 6%. Reduced clinical efficacy is apparent in persistently positive patients. Patients with a suboptimal clinical response or persistent infusion-related adverse events should be considered for antibody testing.

HRQoL was impaired in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients, correlated with severity of disease as measured by neurological ratings or magnetic resonance imaging, and improved significantly with natalizumab.