The objective of this study was to determine whether nitric oxide (NO) is produced locally in the bovine corpus luteum (CL) and whether NO mediates prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha)-induced regression of the bovine CL in vivo. The local production of NO was determined in early I, early II, mid, late, and regressed stages of CL by determining NADPH-d activity and the presence of inducible and endothelial NO synthase immunolabeling. To determine whether inhibition of NO production counteracts the PGF2alpha-induced regression of the CL, saline (10 ml/h; n = 10) or a nonselective NOS inhibitor (Nomega-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester dihydrochloride [L-NAME]; 400 mg/h; n = 9) was infused for 2 h on Day 15 of the estrous cycle into the aorta abdominalis of Holstein/Polish Black and White heifers. After 30 min of infusion, saline or cloprostenol, an analogue of PGF2alpha (aPGF2alpha; 100 microg) was injected into the aorta abdominalis of animals infused with saline or L-NAME. NADPH-diaphorase activity was present in bovine CL, with the highest activity at mid and late luteal stages (P < 0.05). Inducible and endothelial NO synthases were observed with the strongest immunolabeling in the late CL (P < 0.05). Injection of aPGF2alpha increased nitrite/nitrate concentrations (P < 0.01) and inhibited P4 secretion (P < 0.05) in heifers that were infused with saline. Infusion of L-NAME stimulated P4 secretion (P < 0.05) and concomitantly inhibited plasma concentrations of nitrite/nitrate (P < 0.05). Concentrations of P4 in heifers infused with L-NAME and injected with aPGF2alpha were higher (P < 0.05) than in animals injected only with aPGF2alpha. The PGF2alpha analogue shortened the cycle length compared with that of saline (17.5 +/- 0.22 days vs. 21.5 +/- 0.65 days P < 0.05). L-NAME blocked the luteolytic action of the aPGF2alpha (22.6 +/- 1.07 days vs. 17.5 +/- 0.22 days, P < 0.05). These results suggest that NO is produced in the bovine CL. NO inhibits luteal steroidogenesis and it may be one of the components of an autocrine/paracrine luteolytic cascade induced by PGF2alpha.

Membrane disrupting lytic peptides are abundant in nature and serve insects, invertebrates, vertebrates and humans as defense molecules. Initially, these peptides attracted attention as antimicrobial agents; later, the sensitivity of tumor cells to lytic peptides was discovered. In the last decade intensive research has been conducted to determine how lytic peptides lyse bacteria and tumor cells. A number of synthetic peptides have been designed to optimize their antibiotic and anti-tumor properties and improve their therapeutic capabilities. The sequences of alpha-helical cationic membrane disrupting peptides has been discussed, their proposed mechanisms of action reviewed, and their roles in cell selectivity and tumor cell destruction considered. Parameters important for the selection and design of lytic peptides for cancer treatments include increased activities against tumor cells, low cytolytic activities to normal mammalian cells and erythrocytes. The conjugation of lytic peptides with hormone ligands and the production of pro-peptides provide methods for targeting of cancer cells. The therapeutic possibilities in cancer treatment by targeted lytic peptides are broad and offer improvement to currently used chemotherapeutical drugs. Lytic peptides interact with the tumor cell membrane within minutes, and their activity is independent of multi-drug resistance. Lytic peptide-chorionic gonadotropin (CG) conjugates destroy primary tumors, prevent metastases and kill dormant and metastatic tumor cells. These conjugates do not destroy vital organs; they are not antigenic, and are more toxic to tumor cells than to non-malignant cells.

No abstract