Gravity data, the geometry of the Wadati‐Benioff zone beneath western Mexico, and the seafloor morphology of the Rivera‐Cocos plate boundary west of the Middle America trench suggest that the subducted part of this boundary lies directly beneath and is oriented parallel to the Southern Colima rift. Thus, the Southern Colima rift likely formed in response to divergence between the subducting Rivera and Cocos plates due to direct coupling between these two plates and the overriding North American plate. In contrast, the subducted plate boundary lies east of and oblique to the Northern Colima and Central Colima grabens. East of the Central Colima graben a low density zone overlies the boundary and underlies surface exposures of Cretaceous granitoids and associated thermal springs and shallow focus earthquakes; characteristics that are explained by thermal convection induced in the upper mantle by divergence between the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates. These characteristics along with the adjacent locations of the low density upper mantle and the Central Colima graben are consistent with crustal extension produced by the uniform‐sense normal simple shear mechanism.

Four detailed (average station interval = 5 km) gravity transects were recently conducted in the Pacific coastal region of Mexico. A differential GPS technique was used to determine the elevation and coordinates of the gravity stations. The profiles are oriented northeast‐southwest and extend from the coast up to ∼60 km inland. The Bouguer gravity anomaly is decreasing consistently along every profile from 60–80 mGal at the coast with an approximately constant regional gradient of −2.2 mGal/km normal to the trench. A plot of the gravity anomaly against the distance from the trench axis demonstrates that the regional slope in the gravity anomaly is shifting gradually (20–25 mGal) inland along the coast of Guerrero from the southeast (Atoyac) to the northwest (Petatlán ‐ Zihuatanejo). A model cross section of the Mexican subduction zone (MSZ) based on the tomography inversion for the Guerrero region shows that the gravity anomaly values and the regional anomaly trend can be explained mostly by the effect of the density contrast between the slab and the continental crust. The upper surface of the subducted slab (USS) and the seismogenic contact zone between the upper plate and the slab is traced clearly in several seismicity cross sections based on the data of the regional seismic network in Guerrero. The depth and shape of the USS revealed from the seismicity and gravity anomaly data for the same profiles are in good agreement. This correlation may be fairly useful when applied to gravity profiles in order to estimate the depth of the USS and the seismogenic contact in other parts of the MSZ which lack reliable seismicity data.

The interaction of the Pacific-Farallon spreading centers with the North American convergent margin off Baja California, Mexico, supposedly ceased at 12 Ma, when plate convergence and seafloor spreading stopped. We propose a new geodynamic evolution based on full bathymetry coverage and magnetic profiles from 23°N to 27°N (Famex cruise of the R/V L'Atalante, April 2002). The data unveil a major clockwise rotation of the Pacific-Farallon spreading direction, starting ca. 14 Ma, that formed a series of short spreading centers that became extinct ca. 8–7 Ma. We suggest that the transcurrent motion between the Pacific and North America along Baja California was accommodated by seafloor spreading and oblique convergence along the trench. This change in spreading direction was followed by a concomitant progressive demise of both Pacific-Farallon seafloor spreading and Farallon–North America subduction that are attributed to the break-off of the Farallon slab. This also resulted in the opening of a trench-parallel slab window beneath Baja California

There are two significantly different types of models for the convergence rate between the Rivera and North American plates. The first type, the high‐rate model (Bandy, 1992), predicts convergence rates of approximately 5.0 cm/yr near the southern end of the Rivera‐North America subduction zone and between 2.0 and 3.0 cm/yr at its northern end. In contrast, the second type, the low‐rate model (e.g., DeMets and Stein, 1990), predicts convergence rates of between 2.0 and 3.3 cm/yr near the southern end of the Rivera‐North America subduction zone and between 0.6 and 1.7 cm/yr at its northern end. Seismotectonic relationships, which relate seismic characteristics of subduction zones (maximum magnitudes, maximum seismic depths, etc.) to plate tectonic parameters (convergence rates, age of the oceanic lithosphere, etc.) provide a means of distinguishing between the two different models. Three such relationships suggest that the Rivera‐North American and Cocos‐North American convergence rates should be roughly equal across the Rivera‐Cocos plate boundary, favoring the high‐rate model. Employing the high‐rate model, one can evaluate the magnitude and distribution of the strike‐slip component of forearc motion, Vss, produced by oblique convergence between the Rivera and North American plates. The analysis indicates both a progressive increase and clockwise reorientation of Vss northwestward along the plate contact zone of the Rivera‐North America subduction zone. Such a distribution in Vss should produce a northwestward movement of and NW‐SE oriented extension within the interior of the Jalisco Block, consistent with previous proposals of Jalisco Block motions. Also, such a distribution in Vss should produce a slight clockwise rotation of the Jalisco Block in the vicinity of Bahia de Banderas, consistent with paleomagnetic data.

Data from portable seismographs and a permanent local network (called RESCO) are used to locate the aftershocks of the October 9, 1995 Colima‐Jalisco earthquake (Mw 8.0). The maximum dimension of the aftershock area, which is rectangular in shape, is 170 km × 70 km. Our study shows that the mainshock nucleated ∼24 km south of Manzanillo, near the foreshock of October 6, 1995 (Mw 5.8), and propagated ∼130 km to the NW and ∼40 km to SE. The aftershock area lies offshore and is oriented parallel to the coast. The observed subsidence of the coast is a consequence of this offshore rupture area. The aftershocks reach unusually close to the trench (within 20 km). This may be due to lack of sediments with high pore pressure at shallow depth. There are some similarities between this earthquake and the two great earthquakes of 1932 (3 June, Ms 8.1; 18 June, Ms 7.8) which occurred in this region. In both cases the aftershocks were located offshore and the coastline subsided. The sum of seismic moments and the rupture lengths of the 1932 events (1.8×1021 N‐m and 280 km, respectively), however, were greater than the 1995 earthquake. Also a comparison of seismograms of 1932 and 1995 earthquakes show great differences. It seems that the 1995 event is not a repeat of either June 3 or June 18, 1932 earthquakes.