Government absolute authorities in the religion affairs is the authority of the central government. In the dynamic development of political, many district that produce regional policy with respect to religion or to follow religious aspirations of local people. Some districts in Riau Province, a county division during the reform, including the district are very concerned about the development in the field of religion. In addition to physical development, the county authority also extend its authority in the religion affairs. Regional policy is embodied in the form of local laws, regulations regent, or Medium Term Development Plan (Plan) Government District in Riau Province. This is possible because there are no clear boundaries of understanding in the rule of religion affairs  formulated by the law on local government. The central government, based on this study, it gives tacit consent when local governments do just that, because the rate it is going to add a lot of partners in the central government district. There is no struggle for power between central government and local governments, but the expansion of the district authority in religious issues involved in managing the government's response is a manifestation of the district in the religious aspirations of the people of the area

Pancasila has a very strategic position in the life of the nation and state. Pancasila is not only as a source of all sources of law, but also as the basis of the state, state ideology, and philosophical basis of the state. Nevertheless, ironically the interpretation of Pancasila itself is even diverse. It simply depends on the holder of power. The purpose of this study is to find out the correct interpretation of Pancasila in Indonesia, especially the principle of the Almighty God who illuminates the other precepts. This research is a library research. Analysis was carried out qualitatively using a statutory approach, case approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach, political approach, and comparison approach. The results of this study are that there is a deviation from Pancasila when Pancasila is not interpreted correctly and does not want to be honest with the history of the formulation of Pancasila itself. Therefore it is not surprising when in practice, there are laws, understandings, actions or actions that are contrary to Pancasila.

No abstract

This study examined why the Fifth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution was difficult and examined other ways to make the 1945 Constitution as a constitution that is living without any formal procedures. This was a normative legal study using statute, conceptual, sociological, political, and historical approaches. The findings indicated that the difficulty of reviving the 1945 Constitution through the Fifth Amendment is due the fact that the formal procedure for the amendment of the 1945 Constitution was rigid, the Fifth Amendment did not receive any political support, and the momentum of the amendment was not appropriate. Nevertheless, there are other possible ways to make the 1945 Constitution as a living constitution, i.e. through arrangement in legislations, through the interpretation of constitutional justices, and through constitutional convention.