No abstract

The programmed death-1 (PD-1) is a potent immunoregulatory molecule which is responsible for the negative regulation of T-cell activation and peripheral tolerance. In order to investigate the association between polymorphisms of PD-1 and breast cancer, a case-control study was conducted in Chinese female population consisting of 490 cases with breast cancer and 512 age-matched healthy individuals from Heilongjiang Province of China. Four polymorphisms of the PD-1 gene, including rs36084323 (PD-1.1), rs7421861, rs2227982 (PD-1.9), and rs2227981 (PD-1.5), were selected and genotypes were determined by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The frequencies of PD-1.1 GG genotype and PD-1.5 CT genotype were significantly lower in cases compared with controls (P = 0.020 and 0.004, respectively), and PD-1.5 CC genotype and C allele had higher frequencies in cases (P = 0.003 and 0.010). In haplotype analysis, we observed that the frequencies of ATTC and GTCT haplotypes were lower in cases than those of in controls (P = 0.0055 and 0.0012, respectively), whereas the GTCC and ATCC haplotypes had higher frequencies in cases (P = 0.0040 and 0.00008037, respectively). Additionally, strong association was showed between PD-1.1 and P53, and haplotype CCTA was associated with ER status. These results primarily suggest that PD-1 gene polymorphisms may affect the breast cancer risk and prognosis in Chinese Han females of Heilongjiang Province in Northeast China.

Oestrogen receptor α (ERα) antagonists are used in endocrine therapies for ERα-positive (ERα+) breast cancer patients. Unfortunately the clinical benefit is limited due to intrinsic and acquired drug resistance. Here using integrated genomic and functional studies, we report that amplification and/or overexpression of COPS5 (CSN5/JAB1) confers resistance to tamoxifen. Amplification and overexpression of COPS5, a catalytic subunit of the COP9 complex, is present in about 9% of the ERα+ primary breast cancer and more frequently (86.7%, 26/30) in tamoxifen-refractory tumours. Overexpression of COPS5, through its isopeptidase activity, leads to ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of NCoR, a key corepressor for ERα and tamoxifen-mediated suppression of ERα target genes. Importantly, COPS5 overexpression causes tamoxifen-resistance in preclinical breast cancer models in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrate that genetic inhibition of the isopeptidase activity of COPS5 is sufficient to re-sensitize the resistant breast cancer cells to tamoxifen-treatment, offering a potential therapeutic approach for endocrine-resistant breast cancer patients.

Background and Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0–2, poor outcome of 5–6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Results: The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%, P <0.001), an increased rate of 3-month good outcome (69.5% versus 51.2%, P =0.034), and a lower rate of 3-month poor outcome (12.2% versus 41.4%, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the tirofiban intravenous and no-tirofiban groups in terms of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2% versus 0%, P =1.000). However, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased in the intraarterial-tirofiban group compared with the no-tirofiban group (19.1% versus 0%, P <0.001), with an increased rate of in-hospital death (23.6% versus 0% P <0.001), and increased rate of 3-month death (26.8% versus 11.1%, P =0.021). The intraarterial-tirofiban and no-tirofiban group showed no significant difference in recanalization rate (66.3% versus 64.1%, P =1.000). Conclusions: As an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous tirofiban is associated with high recanalization rate and good outcome, whereas intraarterial tirofiban is associated with high hemorrhagic rate and death rate.