Background: Neuromodulators are considered potential therapeutic options for refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Aim: To compare the efficacy of gabapentin and baclofen in patients with suspected refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-four patients with suspected refractory gastrooesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough, who failed an 8-week course of omeprazole and domperidone, were recruited into the open-labelled study and randomly assigned to receive either gabapentin (maximum daily dose of 900 mg) or baclofen (maximum daily dose of 60 mg) for 8 weeks as add-on therapy to the previous treatment. The primary end point was the successful rate of cough resolution; and the secondary end-points included cough sensitivity to capsaicin and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score and reported side effects. Results:One hundred and eleven patients in the gabapentin group and 106 in the baclofen group completed the study. The overall success rate for cough resolution was comparable (57.3% vs 53.0%, χ 2 = 0.357, P = 0.550) between the two groups.In parallel, cough sensitivity to capsaicin and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score decreased after treatment with either gabapentin or baclofen.However, gabapentin was associated with less frequent somnolence (20.5% vs 35.0%, χ 2 = 6.156, P = 0.013) and dizziness (11.1% vs 23.9%, χ 2 = 6.654, P = 0.010) than baclofen. Conclusions:Gabapentin and baclofen have similar therapeutic efficacy for suspected refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. However, gabapentin may be preferable because of fewer side effects. Trial Register: http:// www.chictr.org/; No.: ChiCTR-ONC-13003066.Ran Dong and Xianghuai Xu contributed equally to this work.
Upper airway cough syndrome (UACS), previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome, is one of the most common causes of chronic cough. However, the pathogenesis of UACS/postnasal drip syndrome remains unclear, and physicians in countries throughout the world have different definitions and ways of treating this disease. The various proposed pathogeneses of UACS include the early postnasal drip theory, subsequent chronic airway inflammation theory, and a recent sensory neural hypersensitivity theory. Additionally, some researchers suggest that UACS is a clinical phenotype of cough hypersensitivity syndrome. While the general principles involved in treating UACS are similar throughout the world, the specific details of treatment differ. This review summarizes the various definitions, pathogenic mechanisms, treatments, and other aspects of UACS, to aid clinicians in expanding their knowledge of how to diagnose and treat this syndrome.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are promising for use in regenerative medicine. Low-level light irradiation (LLLI) has been shown to modulate various processes in different biological systems. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of red light emitted from a light-emitting diode (LED) on bone marrow MSCs with or without osteogenic supplements. MSCs both with and without osteogenic supplements were divided into four groups, and each group was irradiated at doses of 0, 1, 2 and 4 J/cm(2). Cellular proliferation was evaluated using WST-8 and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) fluorescence staining. The alkaline phosphatase activity, mineralization, and expression of osteoblast master genes (Col1α1, Alpl, Bglap and Runx2) were monitored as indicators of MSC differentiation towards osteoblasts. In groups without osteogenic supplements, red light at all doses significantly stimulated cellular proliferation, whereas the osteogenic phenotype of the MSCs was not enhanced. In groups with osteogenic supplements, red light increased alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralized nodule formation, and stimulated the expression of Bglap and Runx2, but decreased cellular proliferation. In conclusion, nonconherent red light can promote proliferation but cannot induce osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in normal media, while it enhances osteogenic differentiation and decreases proliferation of MSCs in media with osteogenic supplements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.