Background Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as determined by the patient is recommended by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012 in evaluation of the total severity of the chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients’ symptoms. Objective To evaluate the correlation between evaluations performed by otorhinolaryngologists and CRS patients with commonly used systems. Methods Scores of VAS and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) Chinese version were obtained from 110 CRS patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs, n = 61) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNPs, n = 49) before surgery, which were compared with scores of Lund–Kennedy endoscopic staging system, the Lund–Mackay computed tomography (CT) staging system, and VAS from 3 attending otorhinolaryngologists. Results The median VAS scores given by CRS patients (6.0; 4.25–7.5) do not correlate significantly with the VAS scores by the 3 otorhinolaryngologists (5.5; 4.83–6.5) with a correlation coefficient of .218 (−0.146 to 0.466). For CRS patients, there was only a moderate correlation between scores of VAS and the SNOT-20 ( r = .37), and no significant difference of VAS scores between CRSwNP and CRSsNP, and between unilateral and bilateral nasal polys. For otorhinolaryngologists, a higher median VAS score was found in CRSwNP (6.0; 5.17–7.0), especially in bilateral (6.0; 5.0–7.08) and revision surgery (6.08; 5.33–7.63). The VAS scores of otorhinolaryngologists correlated significantly with the Lund–Mackay CT score ( r = .7536) and Lund–Kennedy endoscopic staging ( r = .5947). Conclusions VAS scores between patients and physicians are not correlated significantly in this study, but they fall within the same therapeutic range and do not change the clinical management of the patients.
Our study has confirmed that the therapeutic effects of ESS on olfactory function last for up to 6 months, particularly in patients with CRSwNP. Although the therapeutic effects plateaued at 3 months postoperatively, the olfactory function continues to recover between 3 and 6 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.