The application of nanomaterials in healthcare has emerged as a promising strategy due to their unique structural diversity, surface properties, and compositional diversity. In particular, they have found a significant role in improving drug delivery and inhibiting the growth and metastasis of tumor cells. Moreover, recent studies have highlighted their potential in modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) and enhancing the activity of immune cells to improve tumor therapy efficacy. Various types of nanomaterials are currently utilized as drug carriers, immunosuppressants, immune activators, immunoassay reagents, and more for tumor immunotherapy. Necessarily, nanomaterials used for tumor immunotherapy can be grouped into two categories: organic and inorganic nanomaterials. Though both have shown the ability to achieve the purpose of tumor immunotherapy, their composition and structural properties result in differences in their mechanisms and modes of action. Organic nanomaterials can be further divided into organic polymers, cell membranes, nanoemulsion‐modified, and hydrogel forms. At the same time, inorganic nanomaterials can be broadly classified as nonmetallic and metallic nanomaterials. The current review aims to explore the mechanisms of action of these different types of nanomaterials and their prospects for promoting tumor immunotherapy.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
The oil recovery
factor in tight oil reservoirs is quite low when
compared with conventional reservoirs. CO2 injection and
addition of surfactants in fracturing fluids to assist imbibition
have been shown to be two effective and practical methods to enhance
oil recovery of tight/shale reservoirs, which, for the former, achieves
carbon sequestration as well. In this study, a series of imbibition
and huff-n-puff (HNF) laboratory experiments were performed on tight
oil samples to explore the possible combination of the two enhanced
oil recovery (EOR) methods. After evaluation, a hybrid EOR strategy,
CO2 HNF after surfactant-assisted imbibition, was proposed
to enhance oil recovery in tight reservoirs. In the hybrid method,
the imbibition process preferentially displaces the crude oil in relatively
small pores, while the CO2 HNF process mostly produces
the crude oil in relatively large pores. Imbibition and HNF compensate
each other to recover the residual oil in the pore networks, which
makes them a perfect combination to enhance oil recovery in tight
reservoirs. In addition, the operation parameters including cycle
number, injection volume, and soaking time of this hybrid EOR method
were also examined, and the results showed that the optimization of
these parameters is different from that in the conventional CO2 HNF operation. This work provides a promising hybrid EOR
method and can be a good reference to evaluate operational parameters
and improve the production performance for tight oil reservoirs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.